Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AndrewCarpenter
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2010
    • 8

    #1

    Cufflinks - 'u' Class Code - Consistently Returned

    Steps taken:

    KEY:
    MCF_7_cDNA_fragments.sam (2X100 cDNA paired end aligned reads from MCF-7 cell line)

    1. cufflinks -m 400 -p 10 -L MCF_7_transcript MCF_7_cDNA_fragments.sam

    KEY:
    transcripts.gtf (transcripts assembled from step 1)
    Homo_sapiens.GRCh37.58.gtf ("reference" annotation from Ensembl)

    2. cuffcompare -r Homo_sapiens.GRCh37.58.gtf transcripts.gtf

    PROBLEM: The .tmap file lists all assembled transcripts as 'unknown intergenic transcripts' (class code "u")

    Would this make sense if there wasn't any MCF-7 transcripts in the supplied reference file? Or how could this be?

    Thanks for any help you can offer.
    Last edited by AndrewCarpenter; 07-19-2010, 07:04 AM. Reason: Wasn't explicit enough.
  • AndrewCarpenter
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2010
    • 8

    #2
    Cuffcompare Output Seems Incorrect

    Steps taken:

    KEY:
    MCF_7_cDNA_fragments.sam (2X100 cDNA paired end aligned reads from MCF-7 cell line)

    Code:
    1. cufflinks -m 400 -p 10 -L MCF_7_transcript MCF_7_cDNA_fragments.sam
    KEY:
    transcripts.gtf (transcripts assembled from step 1)
    Homo_sapiens.GRCh37.58.gtf ("reference" annotation from Ensembl)

    Code:
    2. cuffcompare -r Homo_sapiens.GRCh37.58.gtf transcripts.gtf
    PROBLEM: The .tmap file lists all assembled transcripts as 'unknown intergenic transcripts' (class code "u")

    Would this make sense if there wasn't any MCF-7 transcripts in the supplied reference file? Or how could this be?

    Thanks for any help you can offer.

    Comment

    • nat
      Junior Member
      • Jul 2009
      • 8

      #3
      Hi there.

      I have the same problem with the latest version of Human Ensembl reference file.
      (Homo_sapiens.GRCh37.60.gtf). I have added 'chr' in front of each chromosome number (beginning of each line) - as this was required when I did previous Cufflinks analysis with Homo_sapiens.GRCh37.55.gtf.

      Cufflinks analysis worked well with the v55 of the reference file, but only see 'u' matches with the .60 version of the file. The only formatting difference I see between the two files is spaces between fields instead of tabs as in the v55 file. I have tried editing the file so the v60 file has tabs too - but this didn't help, in fact Cufflinks couldn't read the reference file.

      Have you managed to solve your problem?

      Cheers

      Comment

      • zun
        Member
        • Oct 2010
        • 26

        #4
        the difference between reference and gtf file

        Hi,everyone

        I had the same probrem that the cuffcompare output .tmap file had only 'u'.

        I just resolved this to make chromosome names between reference.gtf and my gtf file from cufflinks equal.

        I hope this will help you

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
          by SEQadmin2



          CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

          Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
          ...
          07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
          by SEQadmin2


          Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

          The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
          ...
          07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 08-13-2026, 12:22 PM
        0 responses
        26 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 08-11-2026, 10:35 AM
        0 responses
        21 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
        0 responses
        36 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
        0 responses
        51 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...