Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AndrewCarpenter
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2010
    • 8

    #1

    Cufflinks - 'u' Class Code - Consistently Returned

    Steps taken:

    KEY:
    MCF_7_cDNA_fragments.sam (2X100 cDNA paired end aligned reads from MCF-7 cell line)

    1. cufflinks -m 400 -p 10 -L MCF_7_transcript MCF_7_cDNA_fragments.sam

    KEY:
    transcripts.gtf (transcripts assembled from step 1)
    Homo_sapiens.GRCh37.58.gtf ("reference" annotation from Ensembl)

    2. cuffcompare -r Homo_sapiens.GRCh37.58.gtf transcripts.gtf

    PROBLEM: The .tmap file lists all assembled transcripts as 'unknown intergenic transcripts' (class code "u")

    Would this make sense if there wasn't any MCF-7 transcripts in the supplied reference file? Or how could this be?

    Thanks for any help you can offer.
    Last edited by AndrewCarpenter; 07-19-2010, 07:04 AM. Reason: Wasn't explicit enough.
  • AndrewCarpenter
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2010
    • 8

    #2
    Cuffcompare Output Seems Incorrect

    Steps taken:

    KEY:
    MCF_7_cDNA_fragments.sam (2X100 cDNA paired end aligned reads from MCF-7 cell line)

    Code:
    1. cufflinks -m 400 -p 10 -L MCF_7_transcript MCF_7_cDNA_fragments.sam
    KEY:
    transcripts.gtf (transcripts assembled from step 1)
    Homo_sapiens.GRCh37.58.gtf ("reference" annotation from Ensembl)

    Code:
    2. cuffcompare -r Homo_sapiens.GRCh37.58.gtf transcripts.gtf
    PROBLEM: The .tmap file lists all assembled transcripts as 'unknown intergenic transcripts' (class code "u")

    Would this make sense if there wasn't any MCF-7 transcripts in the supplied reference file? Or how could this be?

    Thanks for any help you can offer.

    Comment

    • nat
      Junior Member
      • Jul 2009
      • 8

      #3
      Hi there.

      I have the same problem with the latest version of Human Ensembl reference file.
      (Homo_sapiens.GRCh37.60.gtf). I have added 'chr' in front of each chromosome number (beginning of each line) - as this was required when I did previous Cufflinks analysis with Homo_sapiens.GRCh37.55.gtf.

      Cufflinks analysis worked well with the v55 of the reference file, but only see 'u' matches with the .60 version of the file. The only formatting difference I see between the two files is spaces between fields instead of tabs as in the v55 file. I have tried editing the file so the v60 file has tabs too - but this didn't help, in fact Cufflinks couldn't read the reference file.

      Have you managed to solve your problem?

      Cheers

      Comment

      • zun
        Member
        • Oct 2010
        • 26

        #4
        the difference between reference and gtf file

        Hi,everyone

        I had the same probrem that the cuffcompare output .tmap file had only 'u'.

        I just resolved this to make chromosome names between reference.gtf and my gtf file from cufflinks equal.

        I hope this will help you

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
          by SEQadmin2


          Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

          We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
          ...
          09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        19 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        18 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
        0 responses
        36 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
        0 responses
        42 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...