Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • khopper
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 2

    blast2go mapping problem

    I'm using blast2go to find GO mappings and annotations by importing protein sequences and their blastp hits, rather than running blastp within blast2go. However, only 7% of the proteins with blastp hits mapped to GO terms. This is very strange because I previously ran a version of this data set before I removed a very small number of genes that were bacterial contamination of the read libraries, and 40% of the proteins with blastp hits mapped to GO terms. I checked the formatting of the xml files from blastp for both data sets, and they appear identical. Has anyone encountered this problem? Is there a fix?

    I tried the mapping again and got 36% maps for proteins with blastp hits. I have no idea why there was a difference between runs and to not think it worthwhile trying to figure out why.
    Last edited by khopper; 10-10-2015, 04:05 PM. Reason: Problem solved.
  • sgoetz
    Member
    • May 2010
    • 11

    #2
    The gene ontology mapping performance in Blast2GO depends and can vary mainly because of three things: The sequence itself, the blast result and the GO database used to do the mapping.

    A good thing to look at is some of the blast and mapping statistics like species and e-value distribution for the blast results and in the mapping step the list of source-databases.

    Also check a single blast results (context menu - show blast result ) and check the ACC/Symbol and Uniprot columns after the mapping. If no values or values other than gene ids or symbols appear in this columns there might have been a problem with the database you blasted against or during the parsing of the XML result files. In most cases this can be fixed adjusting some parsing parameters.

    Also review the database configuration in the "File"-"Properties" menu to check to which Blast2GO GO Mapping DB version you had been connected to. Check that you are connected to the latest version.

    Somethime sequences are also skipped during the mapping due to connection/network problems. You can can get results redoing these sequences. You can simply rerun the step since only non-mapped sequences will be analysed again. Already mapped/green sequences will not be send again which speeds up the thing and in case you had problems you can quickly check and/or recover some missing results.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
      by SEQadmin2



      Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
      ...
      Yesterday, 11:10 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
      by SEQadmin2



      Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

      There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
      07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:04 AM
    0 responses
    10 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
    0 responses
    8 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
    0 responses
    16 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    31 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...