Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • culmen
    Member
    • Jul 2010
    • 12

    gaps in consensus built from samtools pileup

    Hi,
    I am a newbie to NGS data.

    I was trying to extract consensus from BAM files of 1000genomedata (namely ftp://ftp-trace.ncbi.nih.gov/1000gen...e.20100125.bam 8:125807080-126007080) by samtools pileup consensus calling (ref: hg19 human_g1k_v37.fasta.gz )

    I found some bases/positions like bases between position 125906527 and 125906541.

    What might be the reason?
    Can you guys please help me to obtains those missing bases?

    Thanks a lot,
    Culmen
    Attached Files
    Last edited by culmen; 07-21-2010, 09:14 AM.
  • luxmare
    Member
    • Feb 2009
    • 11

    #2
    The gaps means uncovered genomic positions. The sites without reads are not reported.

    Comment

    • culmen
      Member
      • Jul 2010
      • 12

      #3
      thanks a lot for your reply.

      The gaps means uncovered genomic positions. The sites without reads are not reported.
      I do understand that sites without reads are not reported.

      But when I view that portion in ensemble genome browser of 1000 genomes, I can see consensus bases and coverage at those locations as shown here. ( either there must be some way to get that consensus bases or that browser might be using some other data )

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      25 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      55 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...