Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jetspeeder
    Member
    • Jun 2010
    • 12

    Cuffdiff log file explanation

    Can anyone explain the following results to me

    What do these errors and warnings mean? Thanks.

    chr15:18938734-19082541 Error: sqrt(det(cov)) == 0, 0.000000 after rounding.
    Quantitating samples in locus [ chr15:19158684-19167424 ]
    Quantitating samples in locus [ chr15:19185685-19189691 ]
    Quantitating samples in locus [ chr15:19234785-19239054 ]
    Quantitating samples in locus [ chr15:21024266-21098894 ]
    chr15:21024266-21098894 Warning: restimation failed, importance samples have zero weight.
    Resorting to MLE and observed Fisher
    chr15:21024266-21098894 Warning: restimation failed, importance samples have zero weight.
    Resorting to MLE and observed Fisher
    chr15:21024266-21098894 Warning: restimation failed, importance samples have zero weight.
    Resorting to MLE and observed Fisher
    chr15:21024266-21098894 Warning: restimation failed, importance samples have zero weight.
    Resorting to MLE and observed Fisher
    chr15:21024266-21098894 Warning: restimation failed, importance samples have zero weight.
    Resorting to MLE and observed Fisher
    chr15:21024266-21098894 Warning: restimation failed, importance samples have zero weight.
    Resorting to MLE and observed Fisher
    Quantitating samples in locus [ chr15:21098966-21205659 ]
    chr15:21098966-21205659 Warning: restimation failed, importance samples have zero weight.
    Resorting to MLE and observed Fisher
    chr15:21098966-21205659 Warning: restimation failed, importance samples have zero weight.
    Resorting to MLE and observed Fisher
  • jdanderson
    Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 45

    #2
    Hello Jet Speeder,

    Did you ever figure out/resolve this error code? I just received a similar print out.

    Thank you for any guidance you might be able to give.

    Regards,
    Johnathon

    Comment

    • jetspeeder
      Member
      • Jun 2010
      • 12

      #3
      it's not an error, it's just telling you that there aren't enough reads to provide an estimation is what I was told

      Comment

      • jb2
        Member
        • Jun 2010
        • 25

        #4
        I am also getting the following error message and curious what exactly it means:

        Error: sqrt(det(cov)) == 0, 0.000000 after rounding.

        Comment

        • glacierbird
          Member
          • Dec 2009
          • 15

          #5
          sam error msg here.

          Comment

          • marcora
            Member
            • Jan 2010
            • 52

            #6
            same here... any explanation?!?

            Comment

            • natinreg
              Junior Member
              • May 2010
              • 1

              #7
              hi!

              full of Error: sqrt(det(cov)) == 0, 0.000000 after rounding. here

              Comment

              • jb2
                Member
                • Jun 2010
                • 25

                #8
                I haven't heard anything, but at least it is nice to know that I am not the only one seeing this error.

                Comment

                • adarob
                  Member
                  • Jul 2010
                  • 71

                  #9
                  From Cole:

                  Those are normal errors caused by too little data in complex genes. They get marked as FAIL in the expr and fpkm tracking files.

                  From Me:

                  You can try setting the min isoform fraction (-F) to be nonzero (0.1 is a good one). This will filter low-abundance isoforms and make the genes less complex.

                  Comment

                  • jb2
                    Member
                    • Jun 2010
                    • 25

                    #10
                    Thanks for the help from you and Cole!

                    Comment

                    • kongantik
                      Junior Member
                      • Jan 2011
                      • 9

                      #11
                      I tried using cuffdiff and recieve the same error. I used the GTF output file from cuff compare and there is no option in cuffdiff to specify F

                      Comment

                      Latest Articles

                      Collapse

                      • SEQadmin2
                        Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                        by SEQadmin2



                        Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                        ...
                        07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
                      • SEQadmin2
                        Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                        by SEQadmin2



                        Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                        There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                        07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
                      • GATTACAT
                        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                        by GATTACAT
                        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

                      ad_right_rmr

                      Collapse

                      News

                      Collapse

                      Topics Statistics Last Post
                      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:26 AM
                      0 responses
                      13 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
                      0 responses
                      25 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
                      0 responses
                      16 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
                      0 responses
                      33 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Working...