Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jetspeeder
    Member
    • Jun 2010
    • 12

    Cuffdiff log file explanation

    Can anyone explain the following results to me

    What do these errors and warnings mean? Thanks.

    chr15:18938734-19082541 Error: sqrt(det(cov)) == 0, 0.000000 after rounding.
    Quantitating samples in locus [ chr15:19158684-19167424 ]
    Quantitating samples in locus [ chr15:19185685-19189691 ]
    Quantitating samples in locus [ chr15:19234785-19239054 ]
    Quantitating samples in locus [ chr15:21024266-21098894 ]
    chr15:21024266-21098894 Warning: restimation failed, importance samples have zero weight.
    Resorting to MLE and observed Fisher
    chr15:21024266-21098894 Warning: restimation failed, importance samples have zero weight.
    Resorting to MLE and observed Fisher
    chr15:21024266-21098894 Warning: restimation failed, importance samples have zero weight.
    Resorting to MLE and observed Fisher
    chr15:21024266-21098894 Warning: restimation failed, importance samples have zero weight.
    Resorting to MLE and observed Fisher
    chr15:21024266-21098894 Warning: restimation failed, importance samples have zero weight.
    Resorting to MLE and observed Fisher
    chr15:21024266-21098894 Warning: restimation failed, importance samples have zero weight.
    Resorting to MLE and observed Fisher
    Quantitating samples in locus [ chr15:21098966-21205659 ]
    chr15:21098966-21205659 Warning: restimation failed, importance samples have zero weight.
    Resorting to MLE and observed Fisher
    chr15:21098966-21205659 Warning: restimation failed, importance samples have zero weight.
    Resorting to MLE and observed Fisher
  • jdanderson
    Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 45

    #2
    Hello Jet Speeder,

    Did you ever figure out/resolve this error code? I just received a similar print out.

    Thank you for any guidance you might be able to give.

    Regards,
    Johnathon

    Comment

    • jetspeeder
      Member
      • Jun 2010
      • 12

      #3
      it's not an error, it's just telling you that there aren't enough reads to provide an estimation is what I was told

      Comment

      • jb2
        Member
        • Jun 2010
        • 25

        #4
        I am also getting the following error message and curious what exactly it means:

        Error: sqrt(det(cov)) == 0, 0.000000 after rounding.

        Comment

        • glacierbird
          Member
          • Dec 2009
          • 15

          #5
          sam error msg here.

          Comment

          • marcora
            Member
            • Jan 2010
            • 52

            #6
            same here... any explanation?!?

            Comment

            • natinreg
              Junior Member
              • May 2010
              • 1

              #7
              hi!

              full of Error: sqrt(det(cov)) == 0, 0.000000 after rounding. here

              Comment

              • jb2
                Member
                • Jun 2010
                • 25

                #8
                I haven't heard anything, but at least it is nice to know that I am not the only one seeing this error.

                Comment

                • adarob
                  Member
                  • Jul 2010
                  • 71

                  #9
                  From Cole:

                  Those are normal errors caused by too little data in complex genes. They get marked as FAIL in the expr and fpkm tracking files.

                  From Me:

                  You can try setting the min isoform fraction (-F) to be nonzero (0.1 is a good one). This will filter low-abundance isoforms and make the genes less complex.

                  Comment

                  • jb2
                    Member
                    • Jun 2010
                    • 25

                    #10
                    Thanks for the help from you and Cole!

                    Comment

                    • kongantik
                      Junior Member
                      • Jan 2011
                      • 9

                      #11
                      I tried using cuffdiff and recieve the same error. I used the GTF output file from cuff compare and there is no option in cuffdiff to specify F

                      Comment

                      Latest Articles

                      Collapse

                      • SEQadmin2
                        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                        by SEQadmin2


                        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


                        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                        Today, 07:11 AM
                      • SEQadmin2
                        From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
                        by SEQadmin2


                        Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


                        The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
                        ...
                        06-02-2026, 10:05 AM
                      • SEQadmin2
                        Single-Cell Sequencing at an Inflection Point: Early Impacts of New Platforms and Emerging Trends
                        by SEQadmin2


                        With the launch of new single-cell sequencing platforms in 2026, the field stands at an exciting inflection point. This article surveys the most impactful advances in the field and discusses how they’re reshaping research in cancer, immunology, and beyond.


                        Introduction

                        Single-cell sequencing technologies have undergone remarkable advances over the past decade, transitioning from low-throughput experimental approaches to highly scalable platforms capable of...
                        05-22-2026, 06:42 AM

                      ad_right_rmr

                      Collapse

                      News

                      Collapse

                      Topics Statistics Last Post
                      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 06:09 AM
                      0 responses
                      16 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
                      0 responses
                      36 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
                      0 responses
                      42 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
                      0 responses
                      49 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Working...