Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • standonn
    Member
    • Nov 2014
    • 14

    #1

    Genetic map with RAD-seq data

    NOTE: I tried to explain my question better here: http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=65681

    Dear all,

    I have some RAD-seq data from nematodes (2 parents, ~100 progeny) which I want to use to cluster my genomic scaffolds into linkage groups (ideally each group would be a chromosome).

    The genome has been frozen and is now annotated.

    I performed the following steps:
    1- Quality control of the RAD-seq raw data (fastqc)
    2- Demultiplexed the read files with process_ragtags, from Stacks (-> one file of reads per individual)
    3- Mapped the RAD-tags to the genome (bowtie2 + samtools -> bam alignments sorted and indexed then I converted the bam files in sam)
    4- Used the Stacks pipeline ref_map.pl to build loci, calls variants and construct a catalogs of loci. I ran the program "genotypes" specifying "onemap" as the output format
    5- With the markers in hand (in onemap format), I followed the following steps in R:
    > library('onemap')
    > data_onemap <- read.outcross("/PATH/TO/FOLDER", "batch_3.genotypes_5onemap.tsv")
    > twopts <- rf.2pts(data_onemap)
    > mark.all <- make.seq(twopts, "all")
    > marker.type(mark.all) # I have a LOT of Ds (and a few A and Bs)
    > LGs <- group(mark.all, LOD=6, max.rf=0.4)

    -> With these LOD and max.rf parameters I only get 1 linkage group which links 70% of my markers. I thought that I was getting only 1 group because the percentage of polymorphism between my 2 parental strains is low (0.10%).

    I therefore increased my LOD value to 19, and was able to get 5 groups.But, these 5 groups use only 18% of my markers (330 out of a total of 1814).

    Is this a problem? Do you think my pipeline to build a genetic map out of RAD-seq data is correct? Is it too weak?

    Any help welcome on how to build a genetic map using RAD-seq!

    Cheers!
    Last edited by standonn; 01-20-2016, 05:31 AM.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • kinpict.com
    Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by kinpict.com
    The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
    Today, 06:37 PM
  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2





    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
0 responses
27 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
0 responses
35 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
2 responses
56 views
0 reactions
Last Post kinpict.com  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
175 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...