Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Xiaopei
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2016
    • 1

    Trinity has "99.9997% completed" for 3 days.

    Hi,

    I am assembling about 540 million single RNA sequences with Trinity. I used normalized setting to finish it sooner.

    The command I am using is: nice trinity2 --normalize_reads --seqType fq --single rnaseq_single_trimmed.fastq.gz --CPU 40 --max_memory 450G —verbose > & log &

    In about 2 days, the status becomes:

    ---------------------------------------------------

    ----------- Chrysalis: QuantifyGraph --------------

    -- (Integrate mapped reads into de Bruijn graph) --

    ---------------------------------------------------



    * Running CMD: /biosoft/src/trinityrnaseq-2.1.1/trinity-plugins/parafly/bin/ParaFly -c /new-data/xs253/trinity_out_dir/read_partitions/Fb_3/CBin_3965/c396551.trinity.reads.fa.out/chrysalis/quantifyGraph_commands -CPU 1 -failed_cmds failed_quantify_graph_commands.55174.txt -shuffle

    * Running CMD: /biosoft/src/trinityrnaseq-2.1.1/Chrysalis/ReadsToTranscripts -i single.fa -f /new-data/xs253/trinity_out_dir/read_partitions/Fb_3/CBin_3965/c396553.trinity.reads.fa.out/chrysalis/bundled_iworm_contigs.fasta -o /new-data/xs253/trinity_out_dir/read_partitions/Fb_3/CBin_3965/c396553.trinity.reads.fa.out/chrysalis/readsToComponents.out -t 1 -max_mem_reads 50000000

    succeeded(396550) 99.9987% completed. * Running CMD: /usr/bin/sort --parallel=1 -T . -S 1G -k 1,1n /new-data/xs253/trinity_out_dir/read_partitions/Fb_3/CBin_3965/c396553.trinity.reads.fa.out/chrysalis/readsToComponents.out > /new-data/xs253/trinity_out_dir/read_partitions/Fb_3/CBin_3965/c396553.trinity.reads.fa.out/chrysalis/readsToComponents.out.sort

    CMD finished (0 seconds)

    Butterfly_cmds: /new-data/xs253/trinity_out_dir/read_partitions/Fb_3/CBin_3965/c396551.trinity.reads.fa.out/chrysalis/butterfly_commands

    Fully cleaning up.

    Inchworm and Chrysalis complete. Butterfly commands to execute are provided here:

    /new-data/xs253/trinity_out_dir/read_partitions/Fb_3/CBin_3965/c396551.trinity.reads.fa.out/chrysalis/butterfly_commands



    ---------------------------------------------------------------

    -------------------- Butterfly --------------------------------

    -- (Reconstruct transcripts from reads and de Bruijn graphs) --

    ---------------------------------------------------------------



    * Running CMD: /biosoft/src/trinityrnaseq-2.1.1/trinity-plugins/parafly/bin/ParaFly -c /new-data/xs253/trinity_out_dir/read_partitions/Fb_3/CBin_3965/c396551.trinity.reads.fa.out/chrysalis/butterfly_commands -shuffle -CPU 1 -failed_cmds failed_butterfly_commands.55174.txt

    succeeded(396551) 99.999% completed. * Running CMD: /biosoft/src/trinityrnaseq-2.1.1/Inchworm/bin//FastaToDeBruijn --fasta /new-data/xs253/trinity_out_dir/read_partitions/Fb_3/CBin_3965/c396553.trinity.reads.fa.out/chrysalis/bundled_iworm_contigs.fasta -K 24 --graph_per_record --threads 1 > /new-data/xs253/trinity_out_dir/read_partitions/Fb_3/CBin_3965/c396553.trinity.reads.fa.out/chrysalis/bundled_iworm_contigs.fasta.deBruijn

    * Running CMD: /biosoft/src/trinityrnaseq-2.1.1/util/support_scripts/partition_chrysalis_graphs_n_reads.pl --deBruijns /new-data/xs253/trinity_out_dir/read_partitions/Fb_3/CBin_3965/c396553.trinity.reads.fa.out/chrysalis/bundled_iworm_contigs.fasta.deBruijn --componentReads /new-data/xs253/trinity_out_dir/read_partitions/Fb_3/CBin_3965/c396553.trinity.reads.fa.out/chrysalis/readsToComponents.out.sort -N 1000 -L 200

    CMD finished (0 seconds)

    Fully cleaning up.

    succeeded(396552) 99.9992% completed. ---------------------------------------------------

    ----------- Chrysalis: QuantifyGraph --------------

    -- (Integrate mapped reads into de Bruijn graph) --

    ---------------------------------------------------



    * Running CMD: /biosoft/src/trinityrnaseq-2.1.1/trinity-plugins/parafly/bin/ParaFly -c /new-data/xs253/trinity_out_dir/read_partitions/Fb_3/CBin_3965/c396553.trinity.reads.fa.out/chrysalis/quantifyGraph_commands -CPU 1 -failed_cmds failed_quantify_graph_commands.55278.txt -shuffle

    Butterfly_cmds: /new-data/xs253/trinity_out_dir/read_partitions/Fb_3/CBin_3965/c396553.trinity.reads.fa.out/chrysalis/butterfly_commands

    Inchworm and Chrysalis complete. Butterfly commands to execute are provided here:

    /new-data/xs253/trinity_out_dir/read_partitions/Fb_3/CBin_3965/c396553.trinity.reads.fa.out/chrysalis/butterfly_commands



    ---------------------------------------------------------------

    -------------------- Butterfly --------------------------------

    -- (Reconstruct transcripts from reads and de Bruijn graphs) --

    ---------------------------------------------------------------



    * Running CMD: /biosoft/src/trinityrnaseq-2.1.1/trinity-plugins/parafly/bin/ParaFly -c /new-data/xs253/trinity_out_dir/read_partitions/Fb_3/CBin_3965/c396553.trinity.reads.fa.out/chrysalis/butterfly_commands -shuffle -CPU 1 -failed_cmds failed_butterfly_commands.55278.txt

    CMD finished (0 seconds)

    Fully cleaning up.

    succeeded(396553) 99.9995% completed. CMD finished (0 seconds)

    Fully cleaning up.

    succeeded(396554) 99.9997% completed.



    It looks fine but it has been like this for 3 days, without a little change at all. It is not finished, as the final Trinity.fasta is not generated. I am not sure what should I do next. Should I restart it?

    Any advice will be very appreciated!

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
7 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
12 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
20 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
54 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...