Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Simon Anders
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 995

    #1

    SOLiD WTP alignment file: representation of spliced reads

    Hi

    I've got a data set with SOLiD RNA-Seq data that was aligned with SOLiD's whole transcriptome analysis pipeline (WTP 1.2.1). This software produces a GFF file that represents each read with one line, or, if the read straddles a splice junction, wth two lines (which are usually not next to each other).

    I have trouble understanding how the spliced reads are represented.

    Here is a normal read:
    Code:
    chr2L   wtp     read    75079   75113   30      +       .       bd=1445_1152_746_F3;rs=16;mm=0;g=T12003120303000210002013210322101003330110312122223;i=1;
    There are 0 mismatches (mm=0) and 16 bases skipped (rs=16). if I convert the read to sequence space and extract the part at the indicated coordinates from my refernce FASTA, this alignes nicely:

    Code:
    TGAAATGAATTAAAAGTTTTCCATCAATCTGGTTTATAACAATGACTCTCG  [read]
                    TTTTCCATCAATCTGGTTTATAACAATGACTCTCG  [reference, 2L:75079-75113]
    ----------------  [ <-- 16 skipped]
    Now for a spliced read. This bead ID here appears twice:

    Code:
    chr2L   wtp     read    108217  108226  45      +       .       bd=1636_459_310_F3;rs=1;mm=0;g=T32012102331321332201132130130000113020000230013032;i=1;jp=108588;jt=k;
    chr2L   wtp     read    108588  108622  45      +       .       bd=1636_459_310_F3;rs=1;mm=0;g=T32012102331321332201132130130000113020000230013032;i=1;jp=108217;jt=k;
    The two lines refer each others starting positions via the 'jp' attribute. However if I extract the indicates positions, there is no match:

    Code:
    TAGGTCAAGCGTAGTATCTTGTAGTAACGGGGGTGCCTTTTTCGGGTAATC   [read]
     CTCAGAATCA                                           [reference, 2L:108217-108226]
               CTCCACCAACAATTTAGCCGACCGGAACTCGGGTT        [reference, 2L:108588-108622]
    I can't find these reference parts anywhere in the read.

    I tried many different reads, and always, the non-spliced ones agree with the reference (unless there are mismatches, causing the colour space decoding to lose sync) and the spliced ones don't. Do I have to do something different if I decode colour space for a spliced read? Do I misunderstand the WTP output format? Or is something going severely wrong here?

    Thanks for any hints

    Simon
    Last edited by Simon Anders; 08-23-2010, 02:55 AM. Reason: corrected GFF excerpt

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • kinpict.com
    Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by kinpict.com
    The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
    Today, 06:37 PM
  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2





    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
0 responses
27 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
0 responses
35 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
2 responses
56 views
0 reactions
Last Post kinpict.com  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
175 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...