Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • biocomputer
    Member
    • Dec 2013
    • 62

    Installing bedtools, intel vs gcc compiler

    I'm installing Bedtools for myself on a HPC cluster, the Bedtools website indicates it uses the GCC compiler while the cluster I'm working on uses the Intel compiler by default and says GCC is not recommended (but is available) on the cluster. What is the best way to install Bedtools in this situation?
    1. If I use the default Intel compiler and leave the makefile with g++, it starts off fine then there's an error and it exits with "This Intel <math.h> is for use with only the Intel compilers".
    2. If I use the default Intel compiler and change the Bedtools makefile (I think I'm editing this correctly) "export CXX" line from "g++" to "icc", I get over 1000 warnings but Bedtools seems to install fine (the few Bedtools tests I ran worked).
    3. If I load the gcc 5.3.0 compiler and make Bedtools (using the original makefile with "export CXX = g++") I get about 15 warnings but it seems to install properly.
    4. If I load the gcc 5.3.0 compiler and change the Bedtools makefile "export CXX" line from "g++" to "icc", it exits almost immediately with an error ("icc: Command not found").


    #1 and 4 don't complete as I expected, #3 seems the best, should I use #3 or do something else? I can provide the errors/output from make if that would help.
    Last edited by biocomputer; 03-15-2016, 10:23 AM.
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    For #3 are those actual errors or "warnings"? If it is the latter then #3 may be fine.

    Comment

    • biocomputer
      Member
      • Dec 2013
      • 62

      #3
      Ah those are warnings not errors, I corrected the original post.

      Here's the output from #3:

      Last edited by biocomputer; 03-15-2016, 10:27 AM.

      Comment

      • Richard Finney
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2009
        • 701

        #4
        The warning messages are probably not going to cause a problem.
        The "set but not used" messages are probably harmless.
        The 'signed/unsigned comparison" is probably not a big deal; unless the chromosome size is greater than 2,147,483,647 bases.

        You are unlikely to find one that big.

        This biostar thread https://www.biostars.org/p/12560/ says that there's a species of wheat that has a chromosome that's bigger.

        Comment

        • jmarshall
          Samtools maintainer
          • Jul 2009
          • 39

          #5
          Re #2, compiling bedtools 2.25.0 with Intel's icpc (ICC) 15.0.0 20140723 I got only a handful of trivial warnings (see https://github.com/arq5x/bedtools2/pull/382). If your warnings are similar, I suspect an ICC-compiled bedtools is fine.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
            by SEQadmin2


            Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


            The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
            ...
            06-02-2026, 10:05 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Single-Cell Sequencing at an Inflection Point: Early Impacts of New Platforms and Emerging Trends
            by SEQadmin2


            With the launch of new single-cell sequencing platforms in 2026, the field stands at an exciting inflection point. This article surveys the most impactful advances in the field and discusses how they’re reshaping research in cancer, immunology, and beyond.


            Introduction

            Single-cell sequencing technologies have undergone remarkable advances over the past decade, transitioning from low-throughput experimental approaches to highly scalable platforms capable of...
            05-22-2026, 06:42 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
          0 responses
          38 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
          0 responses
          45 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
          0 responses
          49 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...