Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • biocomputer
    Member
    • Dec 2013
    • 62

    #1

    Installing bedtools, intel vs gcc compiler

    I'm installing Bedtools for myself on a HPC cluster, the Bedtools website indicates it uses the GCC compiler while the cluster I'm working on uses the Intel compiler by default and says GCC is not recommended (but is available) on the cluster. What is the best way to install Bedtools in this situation?
    1. If I use the default Intel compiler and leave the makefile with g++, it starts off fine then there's an error and it exits with "This Intel <math.h> is for use with only the Intel compilers".
    2. If I use the default Intel compiler and change the Bedtools makefile (I think I'm editing this correctly) "export CXX" line from "g++" to "icc", I get over 1000 warnings but Bedtools seems to install fine (the few Bedtools tests I ran worked).
    3. If I load the gcc 5.3.0 compiler and make Bedtools (using the original makefile with "export CXX = g++") I get about 15 warnings but it seems to install properly.
    4. If I load the gcc 5.3.0 compiler and change the Bedtools makefile "export CXX" line from "g++" to "icc", it exits almost immediately with an error ("icc: Command not found").


    #1 and 4 don't complete as I expected, #3 seems the best, should I use #3 or do something else? I can provide the errors/output from make if that would help.
    Last edited by biocomputer; 03-15-2016, 10:23 AM.
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    For #3 are those actual errors or "warnings"? If it is the latter then #3 may be fine.

    Comment

    • biocomputer
      Member
      • Dec 2013
      • 62

      #3
      Ah those are warnings not errors, I corrected the original post.

      Here's the output from #3:

      Last edited by biocomputer; 03-15-2016, 10:27 AM.

      Comment

      • Richard Finney
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2009
        • 701

        #4
        The warning messages are probably not going to cause a problem.
        The "set but not used" messages are probably harmless.
        The 'signed/unsigned comparison" is probably not a big deal; unless the chromosome size is greater than 2,147,483,647 bases.

        You are unlikely to find one that big.

        This biostar thread https://www.biostars.org/p/12560/ says that there's a species of wheat that has a chromosome that's bigger.

        Comment

        • jmarshall
          Samtools maintainer
          • Jul 2009
          • 39

          #5
          Re #2, compiling bedtools 2.25.0 with Intel's icpc (ICC) 15.0.0 20140723 I got only a handful of trivial warnings (see https://github.com/arq5x/bedtools2/pull/382). If your warnings are similar, I suspect an ICC-compiled bedtools is fine.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
            by SEQadmin2


            Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

            We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
            ...
            09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
          0 responses
          18 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
          0 responses
          36 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
          0 responses
          42 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...