Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • frymor
    Senior Member
    • May 2010
    • 151

    #1

    hisat2 output more reads than are in the file

    Hi all,
    I am in the middle of testing the hisat2 mapper and encountered a discrepancy between the output hisat2 gives me at the end of the mapping step and the number of reads samtools flagstat counts.

    this is the output I get, when hisat2 is finished:
    Code:
    cat ../hisat2Mapping/WCE7.stat 
    [B]11389273[/B] reads; of these:
      11389273 (100.00%) were paired; of these:
        5961828 (52.35%) aligned concordantly 0 times
        4647893 (40.81%) aligned concordantly exactly 1 time
        779552 (6.84%) aligned concordantly >1 times
        ----
        5961828 pairs aligned concordantly 0 times; of these:
          138165 (2.32%) aligned discordantly 1 time
        ----
        5823663 pairs aligned 0 times concordantly or discordantly; of these:
          11647326 mates make up the pairs; of these:
            10779117 (92.55%) aligned 0 times
            510907 (4.39%) aligned exactly 1 time
            357302 (3.07%) aligned >1 times
    52.68% overall alignment rate
    @Question - how are the 52.68% are calculated? what reads are being considered here as mapped?

    and this is the number of reads I get, when I run samtools flagstat on the sorted/indexed bam file:
    Code:
    samtools flagstat ../hisat2Mapping/WCE7.sorted.bam
    [B]14328481[/B] + 0 in total (QC-passed reads + QC-failed reads)
    2329052 + 0 secondary
    0 + 0 supplementary
    0 + 0 duplicates
    14328481 + 0 mapped (100.00%:-nan%)
    11999429 + 0 paired in sequencing
    6098403 + 0 read1
    5901026 + 0 read2
    10854890 + 0 properly paired (90.46%:-nan%)
    11407498 + 0 with itself and mate mapped
    591931 + 0 singletons (4.93%:-nan%)
    23248 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr
    18678 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr (mapQ>=5)
    As you can see, samtools find more reads than there suppose to be originally in the file.

    Is there a simple explanation for that?

    thanks,
    Assa
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    52.68% = (2*(4647893+779552+138165) + 510907 + 357302)/(2*11389273)

    Samtools is correct, since if sum the numerator you'll get just under 12 million total alignments, which is exactly what's in the BAM file (14328481-2329052).

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by SEQadmin2




      NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
      Yesterday, 06:46 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
      by SEQadmin2



      Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

      Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
      ...
      10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
    0 responses
    26 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
    0 responses
    16 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
    0 responses
    71 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
    0 responses
    48 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...