Unconfigured Ad
Collapse
X
-
Okay, thanks for the clarification. So since there are no plasmids specified in the other final_contigs.fasta files from using kmer values less than 127, I can confidently say there are no plasmids in these and were only found when using a kmer value of 127?
-
Plasmids are present in multiple copies per cell, whereas the host genome is (typically) a single copy. More copies = higher read depth.
Leave a comment:
-
I was using plasmidSPAdes. If I understand correctly, the plasmid contigs are able to assemble at higher kmer values because they are present at a higher read depth. Why are they more present at higher read depths than the host cell? What about coverage?
Leave a comment:
-
Increasing the kmer length decreases the depth of coverage for each kmer. At some point, the depth becomes insufficient to assemble the de Bruijn graph accurately. Since plasmid sequences are present at much higher read depth, assembly of those reads can tolerate a higher kmer than the host cell sequences. It appears that setting k=127 is a threshold for assembling plasmid but not host cell reads.And also why are plasmids only output in the K127 folder final_contigs.fasta and not the other kmer value folders?
Also, if you're only interested in the plasmid sequences, you may want to use plasmidSPAdes (described here).Last edited by HESmith; 07-28-2016, 08:30 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Update:
In the K127 folder there is also before_chromosome_removal.fasta file. When I try to see if contig in the final_contigs.fasta is in the aformentioned file, I do not find them. So are the sequences that are supposedly plasmid sequences from the final_contigs.fasta in the K127 folder and contigs.fasta in the main SPAdes output directory in the final_contigs.fasta files in the other folders? What exactly is the difference between them all?
Leave a comment:
-
SPAdes plasmids output
Hello all. I have done a plasmidSPAdes run on my bacterial reads to look for any plasmids. In the final output directory, I have the contigs.fasta file which contains the plasmids with the suffix componenet_X denoting each respective plasmid.
When looking at the different kmer value folders the K21-K99 folders seem to contain assemblies of the bacterial contigs in the final_contigs.fasta file, as a normal SPAdes run would. However, the K127 folder final_contigs.fasta is instead similar to the contigs.fasta file mentioned above - it seems to only contain plasmids and not the bacterial contigs.
After comparing the K127 final_contigs.fasta and contigs.fasta files with diff, they have differences. My question is why are these two files different? Is the contigs.fasta file different because SPAdes ran the mismatch corrector? And also why are plasmids only output in the K127 folder final_contigs.fasta and not the other kmer value folders?
ThanksLast edited by ronaldrcutler; 07-26-2016, 07:51 PM.
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by SEQadmin2
Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.
We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing...-
Channel: Articles
-
-
by SEQadmin2
The immune system’s power comes from its genetic diversity, allowing myriad threats to be neutralized through first recognizing foreign antigens. That diversity is also what makes the immune system so difficult to study. Recent advances in sequencing technology and computational biology, however, are giving researchers new tools to understand immune responses and immune-related diseases in greater detail.
This convergence of genetics, immunology, and computation...-
Channel: Articles
09-01-2026, 05:41 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
| Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 09:51 AM
|
0 responses
7 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
Today, 09:51 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 09-25-2026, 09:06 AM
|
0 responses
31 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
09-25-2026, 09:06 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 09-23-2026, 11:05 AM
|
0 responses
26 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
09-23-2026, 11:05 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 09-18-2026, 11:37 AM
|
1 response
46 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by pekgio
09-21-2026, 02:04 AM
|
Leave a comment: