Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Azufre451
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2017
    • 2

    Bowtie2 paired end alignments do not match

    Hi all,

    Maybe someone already encoutered this issue... I am trying to use bowtie2 to map some paired-end reads against a set of assembled contigs (the contigs were built using those reads with SPAdes).

    I am using bowtie2 in this way:
    Code:
    bowtie2 --threads 10 --end-to-end --no-unal -x contigs -1  R1.fastq -2 R2.fastq | samtools view -bS - > bams_bowtie2.3/my.bam
    However, when inspecting the SAM/BAM (either with Tablet, IGV or manually) I see many cases in which the two mates do not align on the same contig.

    I tried to look at the 3rd and 7th fields of the SAM files (the contig-names to which the two mates of the pair align), but the information are discordant. Let's say that I have an alignment that says:

    R1/1 -> contig_1 | R1/2 -> contig_2

    then I would expect to find another record where

    R1/2 -> contig_2 | R1/1 -> contig_1

    However, this isn't always true (and for some of the samples I am mapping, it rarely is!).

    I also opened an issue/question on the official bowtie2 repository (here) with more detailed explaination of the problem.

    I am pretty sure I am missing something important in how to use Bowtie2 on paired-end data... where is the problem?

    Thank you very much for your help!
    Moreno

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
19 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
20 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
21 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
54 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...