Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ahodgins
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 4

    DESeq2 expression level estimate in advance contrast

    Hi all,

    I'm getting stuck on something that seems like it should be simple, hoping someone can help me find my way out.

    I've produced transcriptomes for 10 genotypes across 3 environments (mostly 2 biological reps per G+E combination, a few with more reps). I've used Tophat2 to map reads, ht-seq to generate counts, and run DESeq2 with these contrasts: design=~Batch+Genotype+Env+Genotype:Env.

    Standard analyses are working fine, but I'm getting hung up on wanting to calculate per gene variance in expression level among my genotypes in each environment. I'd prefer to work with DESeq2 output over straight counts to appropriately control for technical variability in estimating expression levels, but I'm puzzled about how to extract this information from the results dataframe. Specifically, if I use a design matrix including the interaction term and then extract the contrast specifying a particular genotype and environment (results(dds_GxE, name="Genotype1.Env1")), I believe this gives me a result relative to my control genotype (Genotype0) in a matched environment (Env1). If I want the result relative to my control genotype in a single environment, but on a scale that is shared across all environments (so that I can compare population variances among the 3 environments on the same scale), I'm wondering if I need to create a dummy variable that combines genotype and environment, and then just calculate the variance on the subset of samples that happen to share one environment?

    Thanks for any insight you can offer.

    A

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
19 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
20 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
21 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
54 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...