Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cindylanzao
    Member
    • Nov 2012
    • 19

    Remove SNP in segment duplication and repeat region

    Hi,All

    I am trying to detect somatic mutations in healthy people, I have searched some reference, however, both of the two detection method contains remove those variants in segment duplication and repeat region. Can anyone explain why should remove those SNP located in these two regions? Thanks!
  • wdecoster
    Member
    • Oct 2015
    • 97

    #2
    In short, because those variants have (due to technical difficulties) a high chance of being false-positive.

    Comment

    • cindylanzao
      Member
      • Nov 2012
      • 19

      #3
      Originally posted by wdecoster View Post
      In short, because those variants have (due to technical difficulties) a high chance of being false-positive.
      Thanks, could you explain a little bit of why variants in these region could be false-positive?

      Comment

      • Brian Bushnell
        Super Moderator
        • Jan 2014
        • 2709

        #4
        In a duplicated/repeat region, there is no way to know whether the read is mapped to the correct location; and thus, it's impossible to determine whether the variant call is in the correct place. Also, repeats are hard to assemble so the reference is less likely to be correct there. Typically you can just discard ambiguously-mapped reads rather than discarding variants, though.

        There's a large block of Chr Y that is similar to Chr X; as an exception, variants in this region are often called on the X chromosome, since if they were discarded, much of the X/Y chromosome would be unusuable for variant detection.

        Comment

        • cindylanzao
          Member
          • Nov 2012
          • 19

          #5
          Originally posted by Brian Bushnell View Post
          In a duplicated/repeat region, there is no way to know whether the read is mapped to the correct location; and thus, it's impossible to determine whether the variant call is in the correct place. Also, repeats are hard to assemble so the reference is less likely to be correct there. Typically you can just discard ambiguously-mapped reads rather than discarding variants, though.

          There's a large block of Chr Y that is similar to Chr X; as an exception, variants in this region are often called on the X chromosome, since if they were discarded, much of the X/Y chromosome would be unusuable for variant detection.
          Thanks Very Much

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
          0 responses
          16 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
          0 responses
          27 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
          0 responses
          37 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
          0 responses
          61 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...