Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Illumina quality scores

    Hi everyone,

    I've got a couple questions about dealing with quality info from Illumina data. What's the general opinion on the following things I've heard:

    1) After a "B" indicating a bad call, all downstream nucleotides can't be relied upon and should be thrown out. (http://brianknaus.com/software/srtoolbox/shortread.html)
    2) The Illumina pipeline filtering throws out lots of useful data. You should work directly from the _qseq and not the filtered _sequence.txt files.

    Thoughts?? Opinions?? Is quality filtering like what's described in 1) overkill if I'm using MAQ as a quality aware aligner downstream?

    I'm eventually aligning (MAQ) all these to a reference genome for ChIP-seq on microbial samples. Our coverage is super deep so I haven't just been throwing away repeat reads, since those could be expected based on our depth of sequence coverage. I'm looking for good ways to clean up our data!

    Thanks!!!!
    Lizzy

  • #2
    About the Read Segment Quality Control Indicator (B thing), are you seeing B in the middle of the quality string, or just a reads which end with a run of BBBBB? See also:

    Discussion of next-gen sequencing related bioinformatics: resources, algorithms, open source efforts, etc

    Comment


    • #3
      @2: Most aligners come with the qseq to fastq converter encouraging passing data from qseq. If you have cpu cycles, it'd be nice to map from and after qseq and see what results you are getting. Once you have that you can take a look to various things. What's the difference on total number of alignments reads and MAPq distributions. Also, you can check the MAPq of the reads that were filtered out by the software. Let us know what you find out!
      -drd

      Comment


      • #4
        Thanks!!

        @maubp: those links were really helpful and cleared up my concerns! I had read an isoltated report and heard tell of the scary "B" but really didn't know what to make of it. Good thing I looked into it, because I was about to trim my Sanger-format FASTQ file that way, which would have been silly... Going back to re-trim from the Illumina format file!

        @drio: good point! I'll try that and let you know how it goes. I guess I was just concerned about figuring out the best way to throw out the "bad quality" reads. I think armed with my new knowledge, I'll try some quality trimming and then run the test you suggest. Will post once the data is chewed

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • seqadmin
          Best Practices for Single-Cell Sequencing Analysis
          by seqadmin



          While isolating and preparing single cells for sequencing was historically the bottleneck, recent technological advancements have shifted the challenge to data analysis. This highlights the rapidly evolving nature of single-cell sequencing. The inherent complexity of single-cell analysis has intensified with the surge in data volume and the incorporation of diverse and more complex datasets. This article explores the challenges in analysis, examines common pitfalls, offers...
          06-06-2024, 07:15 AM
        • seqadmin
          Latest Developments in Precision Medicine
          by seqadmin



          Technological advances have led to drastic improvements in the field of precision medicine, enabling more personalized approaches to treatment. This article explores four leading groups that are overcoming many of the challenges of genomic profiling and precision medicine through their innovative platforms and technologies.

          Somatic Genomics
          “We have such a tremendous amount of genetic diversity that exists within each of us, and not just between us as individuals,”...
          05-24-2024, 01:16 PM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by seqadmin, Today, 06:54 AM
        0 responses
        10 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 06-14-2024, 07:24 AM
        0 responses
        15 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 06-13-2024, 08:58 AM
        0 responses
        14 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 06-12-2024, 02:20 PM
        0 responses
        17 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Working...
        X