Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mrfox
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2010
    • 103

    #1

    Cuffcopmare: errors when using UCSC known genes

    Hi all,
    I am trying to use cuffcompare (v0.9.2Beta) to compare my rebuilt transcriptome with UCSC known gene annotations. However, I got the error messages though I did obtain the combined.gtf and .tracking files eventually. Any explainations?
    Thank you.

    GFF Warning: discarded overlapping feature segment (40547903-40548425) for GFF ID uc007aug.1
    .....
    Warning: transcript uc008hap.1 discarded (structural errors found, length=261032).

    Warning: found 10930 transcripts with undetermined strand.
    Warning: found 139706 transcripts with undetermined strand.
  • RockChalkJayhawk
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 192

    #2
    One of your annotation files is not correct in the placement of strand information. I would start there.

    Comment

    • mrfox
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2010
      • 103

      #3
      Hi RockChalkJayhawk, thanks for your reply. Unfortunately, I do not quite understand what you are saying. Could you say more about that? The annotation I used was the standard GTF file of UCSC known genes. Thanks again.

      Comment

      • RockChalkJayhawk
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2009
        • 192

        #4
        Use one of these GTFs and see if your problem is solved. But first you will need to modify it
        Code:
        awk '{print"chr"$0}' Ensemble.GTF > New.gtf

        Comment

        • mrfox
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2010
          • 103

          #5
          I tried to use Ensemble annotation as reference and it does not have problem. However, I would like to use UCSC KNOWN GENES as reference. Did you have the same warning messages when you use known gene annotations? Thank you.

          Comment

          • RockChalkJayhawk
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2009
            • 192

            #6
            Part of the problem is because the gene_id and transcript_id are all the same when you try to export from UCSC. Is there a reason you don't want to use the ENSEMBLE?

            Comment

            • mrfox
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2010
              • 103

              #7
              I see.
              In my mind, UCSC known genes include more annotations than Ensemble. I just want to make sure that the "new isoforms" reconstructed is truly new.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
                by SEQadmin2



                CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

                Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
                ...
                07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
                by SEQadmin2


                Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

                The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
                ...
                07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 12:22 PM
              0 responses
              12 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 08-11-2026, 10:35 AM
              0 responses
              13 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
              0 responses
              30 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
              0 responses
              48 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...