Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mrfox
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2010
    • 103

    #1

    Cuffcopmare: errors when using UCSC known genes

    Hi all,
    I am trying to use cuffcompare (v0.9.2Beta) to compare my rebuilt transcriptome with UCSC known gene annotations. However, I got the error messages though I did obtain the combined.gtf and .tracking files eventually. Any explainations?
    Thank you.

    GFF Warning: discarded overlapping feature segment (40547903-40548425) for GFF ID uc007aug.1
    .....
    Warning: transcript uc008hap.1 discarded (structural errors found, length=261032).

    Warning: found 10930 transcripts with undetermined strand.
    Warning: found 139706 transcripts with undetermined strand.
  • RockChalkJayhawk
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 192

    #2
    One of your annotation files is not correct in the placement of strand information. I would start there.

    Comment

    • mrfox
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2010
      • 103

      #3
      Hi RockChalkJayhawk, thanks for your reply. Unfortunately, I do not quite understand what you are saying. Could you say more about that? The annotation I used was the standard GTF file of UCSC known genes. Thanks again.

      Comment

      • RockChalkJayhawk
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2009
        • 192

        #4
        Use one of these GTFs and see if your problem is solved. But first you will need to modify it
        Code:
        awk '{print"chr"$0}' Ensemble.GTF > New.gtf

        Comment

        • mrfox
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2010
          • 103

          #5
          I tried to use Ensemble annotation as reference and it does not have problem. However, I would like to use UCSC KNOWN GENES as reference. Did you have the same warning messages when you use known gene annotations? Thank you.

          Comment

          • RockChalkJayhawk
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2009
            • 192

            #6
            Part of the problem is because the gene_id and transcript_id are all the same when you try to export from UCSC. Is there a reason you don't want to use the ENSEMBLE?

            Comment

            • mrfox
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2010
              • 103

              #7
              I see.
              In my mind, UCSC known genes include more annotations than Ensemble. I just want to make sure that the "new isoforms" reconstructed is truly new.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                by SEQadmin2



                Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                ...
                10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                by SEQadmin2


                Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                ...
                09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
              0 responses
              26 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
              0 responses
              20 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
              0 responses
              36 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
              0 responses
              43 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...