Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DeDeoxys
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2018
    • 1

    Differential Expression Analysis

    I am working with novel RNAseq data from a type of grass whose genome has not yet been completely sequenced or annotated. I have a number of FASTQ files with RNAseq data from different parts of the plant and am trying to conduct a differential expression analysis of these files. I was planning to use the DEGseq package in R to conduct the analysis, but from what I understand, this requires me to map the reads to an index to ultimately convert them to the .bed format and I would also need a reference genome file in the ucsc refFlat format. Since this plant genome has not even been sequenced, these files are unavailable, so I thought to map the reads to the genome of brachypodium distachyon, which is a model organism for grasses. I was able to create an index through bowtie using the genome from phytozome, but I have not been able to find a reference file for brachypodium in the reFlat or GTF format. Is there any way to convert to or create a reference file in the GTF or refFlat format, and am I even on the right track to conduct differential expression analysis on these files?
    I also have access to the original RNA assembly data which came from an illumina HiSeq. I'm not sure if this would be helpful.
  • ASintsova
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2018
    • 2

    #2
    I don't know much about plants, but it sounds like you might want to try to build de novo transcriptome assembly - https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...14662817301032

    Comment

    • gringer
      David Eccles (gringer)
      • May 2011
      • 845

      #3
      Use supertranscripts as your reference genome:

      Building SuperTranscripts: A linear representation of transcriptome data - Oshlack/Lace


      Trinity RNA-Seq de novo transcriptome assembly. Contribute to trinityrnaseq/trinityrnaseq development by creating an account on GitHub.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        Yesterday, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      6 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      11 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      19 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      53 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...