Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SDH
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2016
    • 5

    #1

    Issues with bacterial genome assembly (mapping vs. de novo)

    I am attempting to assemble a genome from an organism I am working on. Initial BLAST analysis of some assembled contigs has led me to believe I am dealing with previously described bacterium “X”. Read mapping in geneious supports this as the majority of my reads are used and I get good coverage (bar a few regions of no coverage).

    My de novo assembly however is giving me mixed messages…Though the assembled contigs have a high ANI, >95% when compare to the reference genome, the contigs will not map to the reference. I have a handful of contigs between 300 – 600 kb however, none will map back to the reference. I initially thought this was due to a poor assembly however my read quality is good and I can more-or-less (give or take a few base pairs) replicate the large contigs across two different assemblers (Spades and Abyss) and two different data sets from illumina and ion torrent reads generated from the same organism. DNA was extracted from a known pure culture so it is unlikely to be due to contaminating reads.

    Has anyone come across this before or have any idea of where I might have gone wrong?
  • Bukowski
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 388

    #2
    What are you mapping the contigs back to the reference with?

    You could perhaps try reordering the contigs with progressive Mauve against the 'reference' genome, which might not be that good a reference though..

    Comment

    • SDH
      Junior Member
      • Sep 2016
      • 5

      #3
      Good point - I was lazy and just ran the mapping within geneious though I did adjust the thresholds.

      I will try bbmap - any other suggestions for bacterial genomes?

      The data was trimmed/filtered prior to assembly and the fact I get very similar large contigs from two different assemblers I would like to think they are reasonably accurate.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
        by SEQadmin2


        Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

        We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
        ...
        09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
      0 responses
      16 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
      0 responses
      21 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
      0 responses
      22 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...