Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • doc2r
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2010
    • 9

    #1

    CIGAR should have zero elements for unmapped read

    Hi Everyone

    I am running MarkDuplicates.jar on my paired end-bwa-mapped BAM file. However I get a weird error message, in fact there are 1000’s of these actually (0.5M so far).

    An example is

    Ignoring SAM validation error: ERROR: Record 68, Read name MachineName:1:2:15520:114537#0, CIGAR should have zero elements for unmapped read.

    Has anyone experienced this before?

    When I pull out the reads from the bam file above I see the read details as follows
    (read1)
    MachineName1:2:15520:114537#0 73 chr10 50281 0 69M31S = 50281 0 CTGTGCAATAACTGTGTACAAAAGCCCCAAAGCTTAAATTGTGCAGTTGAGCGCATGTTCTGTTGTTCAGCATTTATGTTGGTTTATAGTGGAAAAGATT
    ?5<3;2><<62@3A<<<7>@@=B7BCC=BB:,<+:9/)<+0;*'+-'271B@BB2BC@CC=B0B<>BA################################
    XC:i:69 XT:A:R NM:i:3 SM:i:0 AM:i:0 X0:i:2 X1:i:0 XM:i:3 XO:i:0 XG:i:0 MD:Z:8A24A3T31


    (Read2)
    MachineName:1:2:15520:114537#0 133 chr10 50281 0 88M12S = 50281 0 TTCATTGTTTGGCATAACAGTACTTCAGATTTGAATCATCTAATAACATTGTCATCATAGCATATTCTCCTGGAAGTAACACACAATAACTACTTCAAAA
    E/EBEDDFDFEFFF=?@CBA.=>.<.9.::EE=EE33?<7D>BCB-<5<>.:37:@<B/<.8986<:9;->A@A@BADBB@BB@AEE############# XC:i:88


    Oddly enough they map to the same position……Although the sequences are completely different. I BLAT’ed the sequences and found for read one and two respectively

    SCORE START END QSIZE IDENTITY CHRO STRAND START END SPAN
    88 1 100 100 94.0% 10 + 50281 50380 100
    86 1 100 100 93.0% 10 - 50520 50619 100


    So sequence two really maps to a different position on chromosome 10 at a distance that’s roughly the expected insert size….

    Could it be because the %Identity is low? that BWA mapped the pair incorrectly?
    Last edited by doc2r; 01-18-2011, 05:53 PM.
  • swbarnes2
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 910

    #2
    Read two didn't map at all. bwa gives it the mapping coordinates of the read that did map. It's so that they will sort together by coordinate. You can tell from the flag: 133 = 128+4+1 = second read of pair + unmapped + paired read.

    The flag for read one is 73 = 64+8+1 = first read of a pair + mate didn't map + paired read

    I'm not quite sure what Picard does with that in markduplicates. If you use stringency Lenient, it won't yell at you about the CIGAR in unmapped read, but I don't know if it will mark duplicates properly.

    At the end, you can filter your .bam for read that don't have a 4 in the binary flag, that'll get rid of all the unmapped reads.

    Comment

    • doc2r
      Junior Member
      • Aug 2010
      • 9

      #3
      Thanks swbarnes2,
      Appreciate the response and the lesson.
      This was most helpful

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
        by SEQadmin2


        Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

        We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
        ...
        09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
      0 responses
      36 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
      0 responses
      43 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...