Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • doc2r
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2010
    • 9

    CIGAR should have zero elements for unmapped read

    Hi Everyone

    I am running MarkDuplicates.jar on my paired end-bwa-mapped BAM file. However I get a weird error message, in fact there are 1000’s of these actually (0.5M so far).

    An example is

    Ignoring SAM validation error: ERROR: Record 68, Read name MachineName:1:2:15520:114537#0, CIGAR should have zero elements for unmapped read.

    Has anyone experienced this before?

    When I pull out the reads from the bam file above I see the read details as follows
    (read1)
    MachineName1:2:15520:114537#0 73 chr10 50281 0 69M31S = 50281 0 CTGTGCAATAACTGTGTACAAAAGCCCCAAAGCTTAAATTGTGCAGTTGAGCGCATGTTCTGTTGTTCAGCATTTATGTTGGTTTATAGTGGAAAAGATT
    ?5<3;2><<62@3A<<<7>@@=B7BCC=BB:,<+:9/)<+0;*'+-'271B@BB2BC@CC=B0B<>BA################################
    XC:i:69 XT:A:R NM:i:3 SM:i:0 AM:i:0 X0:i:2 X1:i:0 XM:i:3 XO:i:0 XG:i:0 MD:Z:8A24A3T31


    (Read2)
    MachineName:1:2:15520:114537#0 133 chr10 50281 0 88M12S = 50281 0 TTCATTGTTTGGCATAACAGTACTTCAGATTTGAATCATCTAATAACATTGTCATCATAGCATATTCTCCTGGAAGTAACACACAATAACTACTTCAAAA
    E/EBEDDFDFEFFF=?@CBA.=>.<.9.::EE=EE33?<7D>BCB-<5<>.:37:@<B/<.8986<:9;->A@A@BADBB@BB@AEE############# XC:i:88


    Oddly enough they map to the same position……Although the sequences are completely different. I BLAT’ed the sequences and found for read one and two respectively

    SCORE START END QSIZE IDENTITY CHRO STRAND START END SPAN
    88 1 100 100 94.0% 10 + 50281 50380 100
    86 1 100 100 93.0% 10 - 50520 50619 100


    So sequence two really maps to a different position on chromosome 10 at a distance that’s roughly the expected insert size….

    Could it be because the %Identity is low? that BWA mapped the pair incorrectly?
    Last edited by doc2r; 01-18-2011, 05:53 PM.
  • swbarnes2
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 910

    #2
    Read two didn't map at all. bwa gives it the mapping coordinates of the read that did map. It's so that they will sort together by coordinate. You can tell from the flag: 133 = 128+4+1 = second read of pair + unmapped + paired read.

    The flag for read one is 73 = 64+8+1 = first read of a pair + mate didn't map + paired read

    I'm not quite sure what Picard does with that in markduplicates. If you use stringency Lenient, it won't yell at you about the CIGAR in unmapped read, but I don't know if it will mark duplicates properly.

    At the end, you can filter your .bam for read that don't have a 4 in the binary flag, that'll get rid of all the unmapped reads.

    Comment

    • doc2r
      Junior Member
      • Aug 2010
      • 9

      #3
      Thanks swbarnes2,
      Appreciate the response and the lesson.
      This was most helpful

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
        by SEQadmin2



        Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
        ...
        07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
        by SEQadmin2



        Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

        There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
        07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
      0 responses
      22 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
      0 responses
      32 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      34 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...