Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CHRYSES
    Member
    • Dec 2009
    • 13

    samtools mpileup unexpected behaviour

    Hi,

    The command below:
    samtools mpileup -ugf 454AllContigs.fasta my.bam | bcftools view -bvcg - > var.raw.bcf


    exits with the following error:

    [mpileup] 2 samples in 1 input files
    <mpileup> Set max per-sample depth to 4000
    [bcf_sync] incorrect number of fields (7 != 5) at 43:101



    Would that mean that the bam file is missing fields? It is created via the standard methods as outlined in the BWA and samtools manuals.

    The alignments are made using bwa bwasw where 454 reads served as query and references.

    The RG fields are created according to the samtools manual.

    The following fields have been set while merging:
    @RG ID:dUMMY1 SM:dUMMY1 LB:454 PL:454
    @RG ID:dUMMY2 SM:dUMMY2 LB:454 PL:454
    (...)


    Does anyone have an idea what the error cause is? If so, please share it here.


    The description 7 != 5 is not helping much to track the reason.

    Thanks,

    Best regards
  • lh3
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 686

    #2
    This has not happened for a while. Could you try the latest version from SVN? What if you use "mpileup -I" to disable indel calling. If both fail, do you have a small example for me to try? Thanks.

    Comment

    • CHRYSES
      Member
      • Dec 2009
      • 13

      #3
      Originally posted by lh3 View Post
      This has not happened for a while. Could you try the latest version from SVN? What if you use "mpileup -I" to disable indel calling. If both fail, do you have a small example for me to try? Thanks.
      The proposed solution with "mpileup -I" has indeed avoided the crash+error, but at the same time it renders samtools to a snp caller only. No indels are called.

      I had done an svn checkout of the trunk lately. The version I am using is:

      $ svn info
      Path: .
      URL: https://samtools.svn.sourceforge.net...samtools/trunk
      Repository Root: https://samtools.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/samtools
      Repository UUID: fd675618-d7d1-4fc3-a54f-e58cce934862
      Revision: 902
      Node Kind: directory
      Schedule: normal
      Last Changed Author: lh3lh3
      Last Changed Rev: 902
      Last Changed Date: 2011-01-24 03:46:18 +0100 (Mon, 24 Jan 2011)


      The samtools binary shows this:
      $ samtools

      Program: samtools (Tools for alignments in the SAM format)
      Version: 0.1.12-10 (r896)


      Note that I could not use GATK for indel calling in 454 reads so I wanted to give samtools a shot in this, but it seems like it cannot handle it (yet).

      Do you have any suggestions on making the samtools work with this kind of data?

      Thanks.

      Regards

      Comment

      • Seq84
        Member
        • Feb 2011
        • 19

        #4
        The proposed solution with "mpileup -I" has indeed avoided the crash+error, but at the same time it renders samtools to a snp caller only. No indels are called.
        Me too i had the same problem of CHRYSES and i've solved with -I option.

        Why it happens? is a version problem (0.1.12-10 (r896-r862)) or is a problem internal to the .bam file?

        Thanks in advance

        Comment

        • cnoirot
          Junior Member
          • Feb 2012
          • 3

          #5
          I still have a problem with the version 0.1.18 (r982:295)
          The reference base is always set to N but in fasta file it's not the case !
          I can't perform varFilter.
          Do you have ever seen this problem ?

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
          0 responses
          11 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
          0 responses
          23 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
          0 responses
          28 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 11:40 AM
          0 responses
          22 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...