Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ghd21
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2020
    • 2

    bbsplit not using all reads in library

    I have RNA-seq files which I am wanting to split based on mapping to reference sequences. I am using bbsplit to map to the sequences and output separate mapping files however I noticed that not all reads in my files are mapped using this method. My read file has 9654349 reads but each time bbsplit only uses 6233783 reads - is there a way for me to force all reads to be mapped?

    When I use kmer splitting in bbduk to map to only one my reference sequences all of the reads are used so I am wondering if there is a flag or something I am missing which will allow me to split based on multiple reference sequences at once.

    Thanks for your help in advance!
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    Have you checked the options about what to do if reads are multi-mapping to more than one reference? I am going to hazard a guess that you just have some.

    Comment

    • ghd21
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2020
      • 2

      #3
      Thanks for your reply! Ambiguous reads are just assigned to the first best site so I don't think that is the reason, it appears that not all the reads are attempting to be mapped? When I change the ambiguous flag the number of reads being mapped doesn't change, only where the reads are assigned, any ideas?

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        How much memory are you assigning to this job? Have these reads been scanned/trimmed before splitting?

        Have you also looked at the output of these reports?
        Code:
            scafstats=<file>    Write statistics on how many reads mapped to which scaffold to this file.
            refstats=<file>     Write statistics on how many reads were assigned to which reference to this file.
                                Unmapped reads whose mate mapped to a reference are considered assigned and will be counted.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        7 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        28 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        25 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        25 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...