Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ewilbanks
    Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 83

    Per base sequence coverage from sam/bam file?

    Hi all,

    Does anyone have recommendations for good progams for calculating the per base sequence coverage for mapped reads in sam or bam format? I'd like for the output format to be human readable (not tdf) so I can input into R for downstream analysis.

    Sorry if this seems basic-- I just haven't been able to lay hands on just the right script and I'm sure there's one out there somewhere that will be faster than something my newbie-self can program!

    Thanks!!!
    Lizzy
  • nilshomer
    Nils Homer
    • Nov 2008
    • 1283

    #2
    "samtools pileup"

    Comment

    • Yilong Li
      Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 41

      #3
      I think GATK -T DepthOfCoverage also does the job. I haven't tried the per-base coverage in GATK myself (= ran it with -omitBaseOutput), but I think samtools pileup omits bases with no coverage, so might require additional additional scripting after running the pileup. Please correct me if I'm wrong!

      Comment

      • droog_22
        Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 10

        #4
        Hi,

        You can use genomeCoverageBed from the http://code.google.com/p/bedtools/ which can also read in BAM files.

        Cheers

        Comment

        • boetsie
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2010
          • 245

          #5
          Hi lizzy,

          see my older thread at http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=7679

          Hope this helps,
          Boetsie

          Comment

          • ewilbanks
            Member
            • Mar 2009
            • 83

            #6
            Thanks everyone! I knew you'd all have great suggestions

            Comment

            • sagarutturkar
              Member
              • Sep 2010
              • 61

              #7
              Thanks for the great suggestions. I find it very useful.

              Comment

              • aggp11
                Member
                • Jun 2011
                • 87

                #8
                I find "samtools depth" pretty useful. The fact that you can get coverage for a list of target regions and also look for coverage with different base and mapping quality.

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                  by SEQadmin2



                  Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                  ...
                  07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                  by SEQadmin2



                  Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                  There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                  07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
                • GATTACAT
                  Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by GATTACAT
                  Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                  07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
                0 responses
                27 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
                0 responses
                37 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
                0 responses
                24 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
                0 responses
                35 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...