Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Marcus_R
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2021
    • 1

    Seeking engineered demo data to verify human read removal software

    Hello,

    I'm looking for demo data to assess how well (or badly) human reads removal works in our microbiome pipeline. That is, I need input data where the outcome is known so I can compare the results we obtain with the expected results.

    I assume this would work best if the input data had been carefully engineered in such a way that (1) it contains a mix of human and non-human (microbial) reads and (2) the ground truth (expected outcome) is known. I tried building my own synthetic (Illumina-based) FASTQ file of 15 human reads and 5 non-human reads but the software we are using at the moment (BMTagger) failed to identify the human reads.

    Someone must have verified the different human reads removal tools that exist but I am unable to find demo data sets. Could anyone advise and/or point me towards existing demo files?

    Thank you!
    M

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
    by SEQadmin2



    Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

    There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
    Yesterday, 05:17 AM
  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:08 AM
0 responses
6 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
0 responses
8 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
31 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
29 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...