Header Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Strandedness of dual-RNAseq samples

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Strandedness of dual-RNAseq samples

    Hi,

    I am processing data from a dual-RNAseq experiment where one sample contains reads from both an insect host and a bacterial symbiont. I seperate reads belonging to bacteria or the insect host by mapping the sequencing data against the respective references. After aligning, I did not know how the libraries were prepared for sequencing so I used infer_experiments to determine the strandedness before proceeding to get read counts.

    Reads were first aligned to the bacterial reference genome. And infer experiments result was the following for a sample_X

    Results for sample_X (reads aligned to bacterial ref):
    This is PairEnd Data
    Fraction of reads failed to determine: 0.0018
    Fraction of reads explained by "1++,1--,2+-,2-+": 0.0881
    Fraction of reads explained by "1+-,1-+,2++,2--": 0.9101

    I concluded the samples are stranded (htseq: reverse, featurecounts 2) libraries.

    I do not yet have the aligment for the same sample_X against the host reference. But I wanted to find strandedness in another sample_Y with reads that aligned to the insect host reference genome:

    Results for Sample_Y (reads aligned to host ref):
    This is PairEnd Data
    Fraction of reads failed to determine: 0.0000
    Fraction of reads explained by "1++,1--,2+-,2-+": 0.2071
    Fraction of reads explained by "1+-,1-+,2++,2--": 0.7929

    When I increased the number of reads subsampled (2,000,000):

    This is PairEnd Data
    Fraction of reads failed to determine: 0.0000
    Fraction of reads explained by "1++,1--,2+-,2-+": 0.3701
    Fraction of reads explained by "1+-,1-+,2++,2--": 0.6299

    The results testing strandedness on host aligned reads are less clear to me. I want to believe these are also stranded (htseq reverse, featurecounts 2) because the reads come from the same source. Am I wrong?

    This is probably silly, but is it possible that in dual-RNAseq data the strandedness of the host and bacterial symbiont reads are different?

    Also, the reference genome used for the host alignment is the predicted coding sequences only. Is this in any way a problem for the tool to predict strandedness?

    I am new to this forum and to rnaseq analysis -any input is appreciated! Thanks!

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    A Brief Overview and Common Challenges in Single-cell Sequencing Analysis
    by seqadmin


    ​​​​​​The introduction of single-cell sequencing has advanced the ability to study cell-to-cell heterogeneity. Its use has improved our understanding of somatic mutations1, cell lineages2, cellular diversity and regulation3, and development in multicellular organisms4. Single-cell sequencing encompasses hundreds of techniques with different approaches to studying the genomes, transcriptomes, epigenomes, and other omics of individual cells. The analysis of single-cell sequencing data i...

    01-24-2023, 01:19 PM
  • seqadmin
    Introduction to Single-Cell Sequencing
    by seqadmin
    Single-cell sequencing is a technique used to investigate the genome, transcriptome, epigenome, and other omics of individual cells using high-throughput sequencing. This technology has provided many scientific breakthroughs and continues to be applied across many fields, including microbiology, oncology, immunology, neurobiology, precision medicine, and stem cell research.

    The advancement of single-cell sequencing began in 2009 when Tang et al. investigated the single-cell transcriptomes
    ...
    01-09-2023, 03:10 PM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse
Working...
X