Hi,
I am processing data from a dual-RNAseq experiment where one sample contains reads from both an insect host and a bacterial symbiont. I seperate reads belonging to bacteria or the insect host by mapping the sequencing data against the respective references. After aligning, I did not know how the libraries were prepared for sequencing so I used infer_experiments to determine the strandedness before proceeding to get read counts.
Reads were first aligned to the bacterial reference genome. And infer experiments result was the following for a sample_X
Results for sample_X (reads aligned to bacterial ref):
This is PairEnd Data
Fraction of reads failed to determine: 0.0018
Fraction of reads explained by "1++,1--,2+-,2-+": 0.0881
Fraction of reads explained by "1+-,1-+,2++,2--": 0.9101
I concluded the samples are stranded (htseq: reverse, featurecounts 2) libraries.
I do not yet have the aligment for the same sample_X against the host reference. But I wanted to find strandedness in another sample_Y with reads that aligned to the insect host reference genome:
Results for Sample_Y (reads aligned to host ref):
This is PairEnd Data
Fraction of reads failed to determine: 0.0000
Fraction of reads explained by "1++,1--,2+-,2-+": 0.2071
Fraction of reads explained by "1+-,1-+,2++,2--": 0.7929
When I increased the number of reads subsampled (2,000,000):
This is PairEnd Data
Fraction of reads failed to determine: 0.0000
Fraction of reads explained by "1++,1--,2+-,2-+": 0.3701
Fraction of reads explained by "1+-,1-+,2++,2--": 0.6299
The results testing strandedness on host aligned reads are less clear to me. I want to believe these are also stranded (htseq reverse, featurecounts 2) because the reads come from the same source. Am I wrong?
This is probably silly, but is it possible that in dual-RNAseq data the strandedness of the host and bacterial symbiont reads are different?
Also, the reference genome used for the host alignment is the predicted coding sequences only. Is this in any way a problem for the tool to predict strandedness?
I am new to this forum and to rnaseq analysis -any input is appreciated! Thanks!
Unconfigured Ad
Collapse
X
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by SEQadmin2
Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?
Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating...-
Channel: Articles
10-14-2026, 09:55 AM -
-
by SEQadmin2
Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.
We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing...-
Channel: Articles
-
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
| Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
|
0 responses
54 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
|
0 responses
40 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
|
0 responses
46 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
|
0 responses
46 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
|