Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Phillip Morin
    Junior Member
    • May 2011
    • 4

    SNPs from populations

    Hi,
    I'm a cetacean population geneticist in San Diego, CA, and I'm trying to use Illumina resequencing of nuclear loci (from capture-array enriched libraries) from 50-150 individuals to detect SNPs in the population, and determine the genotypes of the individuals. I use CLC Genomics Workbench to analyze the data, but have found that it (and other software that I've looked at) is focused only on finding SNPs in individual alignments to a reference sequence, not comparing across individual assemblies.

    Does anyone have suggestions for how I can 1) assemble all of my reads from individuals to a set of reference sequences (CLC does this), 2) do SNP discovery based on variation in reads from the reference for each individual and each locus (CLC also does this), and then 3) compare the SNP positions across all individuals and loci to generate tables of SNP genotypes for each individual and position within each locus?

    Thanks!
  • krobison
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2007
    • 734

    #2
    This is easy to do with some simple Perl/Python or other favorite language code, given the information you describe in #2 written into simple text files.

    If you convert your genotypes to "1", "2", "3" (AA, AB & BB respectively) & have it all in a single table with columns
    markerName, individual, genotype

    then you can get a consolidated view in Excel (or similar program) using PivotTables (rows=individuals; columns=markers; values=average of genotype (ugly trick; since there is only one value you'll get that value)

    If CLC generates such text files, it shouldn't be too bad to manually merge them & fix them, though it would easy to learn the necessary Perl/Python to do this.

    Comment

    • Phillip Morin
      Junior Member
      • May 2011
      • 4

      #3
      ->krobson, We've tried to compile data with R scripts, but the problem is that the SNP detection software will find different SNPs in different individuals, and there is also associated SNP quality data that I'd like to compile to be able to tell whether a SNP is likely to be valid or not. For example, one individual may have a SNP at site 150, but the next will have a SNP at site 175, and so on. There's no way to know all of the sites in a sequence that have SNPs in the population of samples unless the assemblies are all aligned and each SNP site in any one assembly is evaluated in every other assembly. If we use scripts to assemble the data from individual assemblies, we have to assume that SNPs that aren't detected in an individual are homozygous for the reference allele, but that's a bad assumption when quality and coverage varies across individuals.

      Comment

      • kopi-o
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 319

        #4
        (deleted due to misunderstanding of question)
        Last edited by kopi-o; 05-11-2011, 12:38 AM.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
        0 responses
        26 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
        0 responses
        37 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        24 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        34 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...