Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fpruzius
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 4

    Bfast Fatal Error during indexing

    Hi,

    I am trying to index a fastafile with the human genome (build GRCh37, only chromosomes + MT) using bfast. In color space.
    I am using version 0.6.4f. As a guildeline I use secion 8.1.2 from the manual.

    Converting the reads to fastq and making both the color space and letter space brg files work without any trouble.

    However when I want to make the indexes the program grinds to a halt.

    The command I use:

    Code:
    bfast index -f human.fasta -m 1111111111111111111111 -w 14 -i 1 -A 1 -T /tmp/
    So human.fasta is my reference genome. and the files human.fasta.cs.brg and human.fasta.nt.brg have been generated.

    The output:

    Code:
    ************************************************************
    Checking input parameters supplied by the user ...
    Validating fastaFileName human.fasta.
    Validating tmpDir path /tmp/.
    Input arguments look good!
    ************************************************************
    ************************************************************
    Printing Program Parameters:
    programMode:                            [ExecuteProgram]
    fastaFileName:                          human.fasta
    space:                                  [Color Space]
    mask:                                   1111111111111111111111
    depth:                                  0
    hashWidth:                              14
    indexNumber:                            1
    repeatMasker:                           [Not Using]
    startContig:                            0
    startPos:                               0
    endContig:                              2147483647
    endPos:                                 2147483647
    exonsFileName:                          [Not Using]
    numThreads:                             4
    tmpDir:                                 /tmp/
    timing:                                 [Not Using]
    ************************************************************
    ************************************************************
    Reading in reference genome from human.fasta.cs.brg.
    In total read 25 contigs for a total of 3095693983 bases
    ************************************************************
    Creating the index...
    ************************************************************
    Warning: startContig was less than zero.
    Defaulting to contig=1 and position=1.
    ************************************************************
    ************************************************************
    Warning: endContig was greater than the number of contigs in the reference genome.
    Defaulting to reference genome's end contig=25 and position=16571.
    ************************************************************
    Currently on [contig,pos]:
    [------25,------16571]
    Sorting by thread...                                                                                                                                        
    100.000 percent complete************************************************************
    In function "RGIndexMergeHelperFromDiskContig_8": Fatal Error[ReadFileError]. Message: Could not read in tmp lower.
    The file stream error was:: Bad file descriptor
     ***** Exiting due to errors *****
    ************************************************************
    So it works, but as soon when the index should be written to disk it fails. THis happens after around 24 hours.

    I have tried to check if something is wrong with the harddisk, an no fsck dont gives any problems. And I can create a large file with other programs.

    The output file human.fasta.cs.1.1.bif is generated, however has zero length.
  • nilshomer
    Nils Homer
    • Nov 2008
    • 1283

    #2
    In "configure.ac" in the source directory, try changing the following line
    Code:
    extended_CFLAGS="";# "-m64 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64";
    to
    Code:
    extended_CFLAGS="-m64 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64";
    You then probably need to re-run "bfast fasta2brg".

    Comment

    • fpruzius
      Junior Member
      • Sep 2009
      • 4

      #3
      Thanks for the reply.
      I changed the configuration file and recompiled the source.

      Unoftunately it did not help. still getting the following error:

      Code:
      Sorting...                                                                                                                                              100.000 percent complete************************************************************
      In function "RGIndexMergeHelperFromDiskContig_8": Fatal Error[ReadFileError]. Message: Could not read in tmp lower.
      The file stream error was:: Bad file descriptor
       ***** Exiting due to errors *****
      ************************************************************

      Comment

      • nilshomer
        Nils Homer
        • Nov 2008
        • 1283

        #4
        Originally posted by fpruzius View Post
        Thanks for the reply.
        I changed the configuration file and recompiled the source.

        Unoftunately it did not help. still getting the following error:

        Code:
        Sorting...                                                                                                                                              100.000 percent complete************************************************************
        In function "RGIndexMergeHelperFromDiskContig_8": Fatal Error[ReadFileError]. Message: Could not read in tmp lower.
        The file stream error was:: Bad file descriptor
         ***** Exiting due to errors *****
        ************************************************************
        I can't replicate your error, so unfortunately I cannot debug. Could you try it on a different computer and see if you can replicate?

        Comment

        • cdry7ue
          Member
          • Feb 2011
          • 20

          #6
          Nils,
          I am getting the exact same error


          In function "RGIndexMergeHelperFromDiskContig_8": Fatal Error[ReadFileError]. Message: Could not read in tmp lower.
          The file stream error was:: Bad file descriptor
          ***** Exiting due to errors *****
          ************************************************************

          [1]+ Exit 1 bfast index -m 111111111111111111111111 -w 14 -n 32 -i 1 -f hg19.fa

          Were you guys ever able to find out what the deal was with this one? I also have a 64 bit system with 2Tb disk space.
          -Ashish

          Comment

          • nilshomer
            Nils Homer
            • Nov 2008
            • 1283

            #7
            I would LOVE to get a test case so that I can reproduce. Until then, I have to keep guessing.

            Could you try to apply this change?
            Code:
            diff --git a/bfast/RGIndex.c b/bfast/RGIndex.c
            index 3e8f57a..2953596 100644
            --- a/bfast/RGIndex.c
            +++ b/bfast/RGIndex.c
            @@ -1356,8 +1356,15 @@ void RGIndexMergeHelperFromDiskContig_8(RGIndex *index,
                    }
             
                    /* Move to beginning of the files */
            +        /*
                    fseek(tmpLowerFP, 0 , SEEK_SET);
                    fseek(tmpUpperFP, 0 , SEEK_SET);
            +        */
            +        fclose(tmpLowerFP);
            +        tmpLowerFP = fopen(tmpLowerFileName, "wb+");
            +        assert(NULL != tmpLowerFP);
            +        tmpUpperFP = fopen(tmpUpperFileName, "wb+");
            +        assert(NULL != tmpUpperFP);

            Comment

            • Magnus
              Junior Member
              • Nov 2009
              • 5

              #8
              +1, same error for me as well.

              Tested both extended_CFLAGS="-m64 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64" and the patch without any success .

              What could I do to help you find a solution Nils?

              Comment

              • nilshomer
                Nils Homer
                • Nov 2008
                • 1283

                #9
                Do you have a test case? Give me a FASTA and detail your environment (OS, machine, bfast version).

                Nils

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • seqadmin
                  New Genomics Tools and Methods Shared at AGBT 2025
                  by seqadmin


                  This year’s Advances in Genome Biology and Technology (AGBT) General Meeting commemorated the 25th anniversary of the event at its original venue on Marco Island, Florida. While this year’s event didn’t include high-profile musical performances, the industry announcements and cutting-edge research still drew the attention of leading scientists.

                  The Headliner
                  The biggest announcement was Roche stepping back into the sequencing platform market. In the years since...
                  03-03-2025, 01:39 PM
                • seqadmin
                  Investigating the Gut Microbiome Through Diet and Spatial Biology
                  by seqadmin




                  The human gut contains trillions of microorganisms that impact digestion, immune functions, and overall health1. Despite major breakthroughs, we’re only beginning to understand the full extent of the microbiome’s influence on health and disease. Advances in next-generation sequencing and spatial biology have opened new windows into this complex environment, yet many questions remain. This article highlights two recent studies exploring how diet influences microbial...
                  02-24-2025, 06:31 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by seqadmin, 03-20-2025, 05:03 AM
                0 responses
                17 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post seqadmin  
                Started by seqadmin, 03-19-2025, 07:27 AM
                0 responses
                18 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post seqadmin  
                Started by seqadmin, 03-18-2025, 12:50 PM
                0 responses
                19 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post seqadmin  
                Started by seqadmin, 03-03-2025, 01:15 PM
                0 responses
                185 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post seqadmin  
                Working...