Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Tefina
    Member
    • Jun 2010
    • 13

    #1

    Allowed maximum number of differences in BWA

    The paper says the following:

    Given a read of length m, BWA only tolerates a hit with at most k differences (mismatches or gaps), where k is chosen such that <4% of m-long reads with 2% uniform base error rate may contain differences more than k. With this configuration, for 15–37 bp reads, k equals 2; for 38–63 bp, k=3; for 64–92 bp, k=4; for 93–123 bp, k=5; and for 124–156 bp reads, k=6.

    Can somebody explain me how the exact calculation is done?

    best,
    tefina
  • dp05yk
    Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 66

    #2
    This is just the default -n value. You can override this by specifying your own -n value, but remember, the more errors you allow, the longer BWA will take to run.

    Comment

    • Tefina
      Member
      • Jun 2010
      • 13

      #3
      Thanks for your answer.
      I am aware that this is just the default value and can be changes easily. I am just wondering how they calculate these thesholds (from the given 2% error rate and the specified 4% of maximum allowed differences).

      Comment

      • dp05yk
        Member
        • Dec 2010
        • 66

        #4
        There's a function in the file "bwtaln.c", called "bwa_cal_max_diff" that does this.



        The first paramater, l, is the length of the sequence.
        The second parameter, err, is the average error specified by the paper (a constant set to 0.02)
        The third parameter, thres, is the error threshold, which I am assuming corresponds to the 4% (0.04) listed in the paper.

        Comment

        • Tefina
          Member
          • Jun 2010
          • 13

          #5
          Thanks a lot for the info!
          Now I just have to make sense out of this

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
            by SEQadmin2




            NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
            Today, 06:46 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
          0 responses
          23 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
          0 responses
          15 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
          0 responses
          68 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
          0 responses
          48 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...