Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • traeki
    Member
    • May 2011
    • 11

    Retrieving mismatch details from tophat

    Hi, all,

    Summary: How can I see the details of the mismatch locations for tophat alignments?

    Details:

    In the SAM output of a tophat run, there are two potential sources I'm aware of for finding information about the alignment details for each entry.

    1) The CIGAR mandatory field, which is generally either xM, where x is the number of aligned bases, or xMyNzM, where x + z is the number of combined bases, and y is the length of the intron.

    2) The MD:Z optional field, which contains a more detailed representation that indicates exactly which pieces of the reference match were altered or elided in the read. (There is also an NM:i field which tells the number of mismatches, but not where they fall.)

    In bowtie output, both of these are present. But in my tophat output, MD is consistently absent, and I have only the much less informative CIGAR field (and yet, the SAM spec does provide for more detail in the CIGAR field, but it is optional, and neither bowtie nor tophat incorporates X/= tokens).

    I could write a script that chews over the original genome and the output alignments and reconstructs this information, but since I know the internal bowtie output must be generating this information at least for the matches that don't involve exons, I'm hoping that there's a way to have tophat provide it to me directly.

    Anybody know how to solve this problem? I'm pretty new to this, so I could well be missing something obvious (a supplemental tool, a flag, etc).

    Thanks!

    -John
  • hesterj
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2010
    • 1

    #2
    The samtools calmd command will calculate the proper md flags given a sam file and the genome in fasta format.

    link

    If I remember correctly it runs much faster if the sam file has been sorted previous to running calmd, look at the samtools sort command for how to do that.

    Historically the CIGAR field only dealt with insertion deletions, both matches and mismatches are designated with a 'M' in the CIGAR string. That seems to have been changed in a more recent revision of the format, but I don't know of any programs which have implemented it yet.

    Comment

    • traeki
      Member
      • May 2011
      • 11

      #3
      Perfect, thanks @hesterj! That'll save me a lot of time.

      And no worries on the sorting, my downstream processing depends on that in any case.

      -John

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • seqadmin
        New Genomics Tools and Methods Shared at AGBT 2025
        by seqadmin


        This year’s Advances in Genome Biology and Technology (AGBT) General Meeting commemorated the 25th anniversary of the event at its original venue on Marco Island, Florida. While this year’s event didn’t include high-profile musical performances, the industry announcements and cutting-edge research still drew the attention of leading scientists.

        The Headliner
        The biggest announcement was Roche stepping back into the sequencing platform market. In the years since...
        03-03-2025, 01:39 PM
      • seqadmin
        Investigating the Gut Microbiome Through Diet and Spatial Biology
        by seqadmin




        The human gut contains trillions of microorganisms that impact digestion, immune functions, and overall health1. Despite major breakthroughs, we’re only beginning to understand the full extent of the microbiome’s influence on health and disease. Advances in next-generation sequencing and spatial biology have opened new windows into this complex environment, yet many questions remain. This article highlights two recent studies exploring how diet influences microbial...
        02-24-2025, 06:31 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by seqadmin, 03-20-2025, 05:03 AM
      0 responses
      18 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 03-19-2025, 07:27 AM
      0 responses
      25 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 03-18-2025, 12:50 PM
      0 responses
      19 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 03-03-2025, 01:15 PM
      0 responses
      187 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Working...