Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hiberbear
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2012
    • 3

    different md5sum id for same BAM file

    Hi guys:

    I am new to sequencing and going to ask some silly questions...

    I got some sequence data from the core facility and they are already mapped to human genome. It is exome sequencing.

    For each BAM file, there is a bam.bai file.

    For curiosity, I regenerated the bam.bai files with samtools (samtools-0.1.18) ( samtools index XXXX.bam), and compare old and new bai files use md5. I suppose they should be same since they generated from the same BAM files. But they gave me different md5 ID...

    I was wondering that maybe the original BAM is not sorted, so I sorted them (samtools sort) myself., and re-index them. I got three bam.bai files, each of them have different md5 id.

    I used the "samtools view -H XXX.BAM" to see if the original BAM files are sorted, I got "@HD VN:1.0 SO:coordinate", suggesting they are sorted files. The wired thing is that the original sorted files and new generated files are different in size, the new one is BIGGER!

    I compared the first 10000 lines of each BAM files by "samtools view", they are idential. I have no idea while they are different in size.

    In the beginning I want to use the existed BAM files because core facility are experienced in generating sequence and mapping them to genome, they probably know the best parameters in software (I guess bwa, "@PG ID:bwa PN:bwa").

    Now I am little bit confused, should I use the existed,sorted BAM files with original BAI files? or I should use the BAM with new generated BAI files? or even map the original reads myself? Or I just simply misunderstand the use of md5? How to explain the difference between the old and sorted BAM files?

    Many thanks.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
    by SEQadmin2


    Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


    The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
    ...
    06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
12 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
48 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
0 responses
106 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
0 responses
125 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...