Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • erlandsen
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2011
    • 6

    Exome multiplexing

    Hi,

    have anyone tried to multiplex samples and targeted for higher coverage in samples vs. controls. Eg. as in the truseq exome enrichment one is expected to pool 500 ng of each library, but instead use 25 % control and 75% sample?

    Another question: is it possible to go down in concentration say to 250 ng into the exome enrichment protocol, or is 500 ng an absolute lower limit?

    Regards,

    see
  • kwaraska
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 131

    #2
    I know with Sure Select you can pool in any proportion you want, but the lower limit really is the least you shoudl work with. Keep in mind that they obtain their values from nanodrop which is roughly twice what you will see on a bioanlyzer. So you can use 250ng from a bioanlyzer concentration but 500ng from a nanodrop.

    At least, that has been my experience.

    Comment

    • erlandsen
      Junior Member
      • Oct 2011
      • 6

      #3
      Hi kwaraska, and thanks for comment.

      I only use Qbit for cuantifying the libraries on this step. But I have checked NanoDrop, Qbit and qRT-PCR quantification on the Truseq protocol, and my experience is that NanoDrop "overestimate" ca 20 % compared to Qbit and Qbit again "overestimate" ca 10-15% compared to qRT-PCR. I trust qRT-PCR to be most reliable. I never use Bioanalyzer for quantification.

      Comment

      • kwaraska
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2008
        • 131

        #4
        Agreed that is the most reliable.

        But when they tell you that you need 500ng, they are assuming data from a nondrop. I have used 250ng from a bioanlyzer and done well.

        If you feel the difference is 20% then you can use 400ng instead of 500ng.

        It is assumed that you will not use qPCR at this step because it will not be reliable for what you are trying to generate. You simply need sufficient DNA library to capture.

        Comment

        • mveerapen
          Junior Member
          • Feb 2013
          • 1

          #5
          I am using the SureSelect 50 Mb capture - would I be able to multiplex my samples. I was thinking of including a 1:1 (in terms of QuBit concentration) in the capture. Would I be able to computationally tease out which variants belong to which sample?

          On another note, if I have a mixed sample, where the DNA was extracted from a fixed tissue that has a heterogenous tissue (where I assume 0.25:0.75 ratio of tissue 1:tissue 2), would I be able to tease out variants belonging to tissue 1 and 2 separately?

          If I had posted this question in a wrong thread, please correct me? I am new in SEQanswers.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
            by SEQadmin2


            Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


            The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
            ...
            06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          8 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          44 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
          0 responses
          104 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
          0 responses
          125 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...