Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GenoMax
    replied
    Originally posted by chjp0632 View Post
    I am curious the cost for one SMRT cell sequencing (not including human force) ?
    Here is a list of the PacBio sequence providers. http://www.pacificbiosciences.com/su...cing_provider/ You will have to ask for a quote.

    Leave a comment:


  • chjp0632
    replied
    I am curious the cost for one SMRT cell sequencing (not including human force) ?

    Leave a comment:


  • flxlex
    replied
    Originally posted by samanta View Post
    Thanks folks.

    Flxlex, I presume that 730 Mb is one time observation, right?
    The run was an outlier, yes, with the 730 being the best SMRTcell...

    Leave a comment:


  • samanta
    replied
    Thanks folks.

    Flxlex, I presume that 730 Mb is one time observation, right?

    Leave a comment:


  • flxlex
    replied
    Before P4, 150-300 was common. Our best P4-C2 run was a raw read average length of 7.6 kbp and yielded 730 Mbp (!) for a CCS project (96k reads, but the insert was only 500 bp).

    Leave a comment:


  • GenoMax
    replied
    With XL chemistry we have recently typically seen 240-270 Mb per smrtcell with 5-6 kb reads (1 x 120 min on an RSII machine).
    Last edited by GenoMax; 10-05-2013, 12:27 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • samanta
    started a topic Pacbio - What is the Typical Throughput?

    Pacbio - What is the Typical Throughput?

    Based on sparsity of pacbio-related posts, I presume nobody uses the technology. I was at their recent user group meeting and liked the smell of the coffee

    I will go out on a limb and make a bold call. The world of genomics is on the verge of seeing another set of major transformations, and many algorithms, tools, pipelines and methodologies developed for short reads over the last 3-4 years will be useless. In my opinion, the era of short-read sequencing is reaching a peak, or to be kind to its users, short read technologies are shining like the full moon. Related to peaking of the short read era, we will see two other changes - (i) end of “genome sequencing and genome paper” era and (ii) end of big data bioinformatics. For further explanation of the last sentence, please read the detailed explanation in the later part of the commentary.


    PacBio reads are long (~10 Kb) but noisy at the nucleotide level. In part I of this commentary, I argued that the short reads are also ‘noisy’ in a different way. Their loss of information through short length manifests into producing lower quality genomes and transcriptomes. Cleaning up of the noise at the genome and transcriptome level adds to significant bioinformatics cost. Now that the excitement of publishing ‘draft’ genomes of various cool plants and animals is over, choice of short vs long technology will depend on the total cost for acquiring different kinds of biological information. What is biologically informative varies from project to project and it is not straightforward to compare the cost of information content for two technologies. However, a number of talks at the recent PacBio user group meeting mentioned that the long PacBio reads are competitive at cost per information content, when users are looking for fully assembled small to mid-sized genomes, or reconstructing complex genomic regions (MHC) or isoforms from transcriptome.


    One question, where I presume the company's estimates could be on the high side is the throughput per SMRT cell. What is your usual experience? Are the numbers listed here achievable?

    The last number from krobison (81Mb) is quite low compared to what I heard at the meeting (400-500 Mb). Also mention the chemistry you are using.
    Last edited by samanta; 10-05-2013, 08:10 AM.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • kinpict.com
    Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by kinpict.com
    The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
    Yesterday, 06:37 PM
  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2





    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
0 responses
28 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
0 responses
35 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
2 responses
57 views
0 reactions
Last Post kinpict.com  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
175 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...