Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • muhe1985
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2014
    • 4

    Does 'verifying by Westernblot after Crosslinking really work?'

    Hi all:

    I am working on a in vivo Chip-Seq experiment. The protein I am interested in is a transcription factor. I made an N-terminal tagged Knock-in version of this mice, so every protein comes out of this allele is HA tagged. The expression and function of this tag has been extensively characterize by IHC and Westernblot.

    This protein does not express in high level.

    Recently I start off working on whether several of my HA antibodies I used can function in ChIP assay. The target of this protein is not known, so I tried to westernblot my Chip sample after final wash to at least confirm my protein is pulled down. However, although all the antibodies I tried worked on regular IP, I can not find my protein of interst in the ChIP-crosslinked pulldown lane.

    Before I am going deeper down the troubleshooting route, can anyone give me a suggestion whether the method I used to test the Chipability of my HA antibodies are valid? Although many online protocol simply stated that'To test if the antibody pulls down the target of interest you can perform ChIP up to the final wash after the IP and then boil the beads in loading buffer for 10 min. You can then confirm the presence of your protein in the IP by Western blot.' I rarely find any real paper showing that.

    And in my case, is this even possible for low expression proteins? my band is not strong even in regular IP. so is it possible that I actually captured Crosslinked protein but the full length protein is just not enough to show up on westernblot? (I figure the band should be much more faint than the band showed on regular IP)

    Thanks alot!!!!
  • muhe1985
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2014
    • 4

    #2
    Really appreciate some comments on this topic!!! Thanks!!

    Comment

    • kerplunk412
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2012
      • 119

      #3
      I spoke with someone who got her PhD in a lab that did a lot of ChIP, and their protocol was to heat the sample at 95 degrees for 30 minutes in loading buffer before loading for Western blot. You may want to try that.

      You may also want to try saving your washes and running some on Western blot to see if you are losing your protein if interest in a wash step.

      In general, I believe your methods are valid. I have done many RNA-binding protein IPs, and I was always able to confirm the success of the IP by Western blot, often with as little as 1/20 of my sample, although the proteins were reasonably well expressed.

      I personally would not trust ChIP-Seq data without verification by Western blot, although I guess many do.
      Last edited by kerplunk412; 05-29-2014, 04:07 PM.

      Comment

      • muhe1985
        Junior Member
        • Jan 2014
        • 4

        #4
        Thank you very much for your detailed reply and instruction!

        According to your experience, what would the band from CHIP-Westernblot look like? a faint 'smear like' band or a solid strong band?

        Best,




        Originally posted by kerplunk412 View Post
        I spoke with someone who got her PhD in a lab that did a lot of ChIP, and their protocol was to heat the sample at 95 degrees for 30 minutes in loading buffer before loading for Western blot. You may want to try that.

        You may also want to try saving your washes and running some on Western blot to see if you are losing your protein if interest in a wash step.

        In general, I believe your methods are valid. I have done many RNA-binding protein IPs, and I was always able to confirm the success of the IP by Western blot, often with as little as 1/20 of my sample, although the proteins were reasonably well expressed.

        I personally would not trust ChIP-Seq data without verification by Western blot, although I guess many do.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          Yesterday, 07:11 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
          by SEQadmin2


          Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


          The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
          ...
          06-02-2026, 10:05 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Single-Cell Sequencing at an Inflection Point: Early Impacts of New Platforms and Emerging Trends
          by SEQadmin2


          With the launch of new single-cell sequencing platforms in 2026, the field stands at an exciting inflection point. This article surveys the most impactful advances in the field and discusses how they’re reshaping research in cancer, immunology, and beyond.


          Introduction

          Single-cell sequencing technologies have undergone remarkable advances over the past decade, transitioning from low-throughput experimental approaches to highly scalable platforms capable of...
          05-22-2026, 06:42 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
        0 responses
        38 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
        0 responses
        45 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
        0 responses
        49 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...