Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • muhe1985
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2014
    • 4

    #1

    Does 'verifying by Westernblot after Crosslinking really work?'

    Hi all:

    I am working on a in vivo Chip-Seq experiment. The protein I am interested in is a transcription factor. I made an N-terminal tagged Knock-in version of this mice, so every protein comes out of this allele is HA tagged. The expression and function of this tag has been extensively characterize by IHC and Westernblot.

    This protein does not express in high level.

    Recently I start off working on whether several of my HA antibodies I used can function in ChIP assay. The target of this protein is not known, so I tried to westernblot my Chip sample after final wash to at least confirm my protein is pulled down. However, although all the antibodies I tried worked on regular IP, I can not find my protein of interst in the ChIP-crosslinked pulldown lane.

    Before I am going deeper down the troubleshooting route, can anyone give me a suggestion whether the method I used to test the Chipability of my HA antibodies are valid? Although many online protocol simply stated that'To test if the antibody pulls down the target of interest you can perform ChIP up to the final wash after the IP and then boil the beads in loading buffer for 10 min. You can then confirm the presence of your protein in the IP by Western blot.' I rarely find any real paper showing that.

    And in my case, is this even possible for low expression proteins? my band is not strong even in regular IP. so is it possible that I actually captured Crosslinked protein but the full length protein is just not enough to show up on westernblot? (I figure the band should be much more faint than the band showed on regular IP)

    Thanks alot!!!!
  • muhe1985
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2014
    • 4

    #2
    Really appreciate some comments on this topic!!! Thanks!!

    Comment

    • kerplunk412
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2012
      • 119

      #3
      I spoke with someone who got her PhD in a lab that did a lot of ChIP, and their protocol was to heat the sample at 95 degrees for 30 minutes in loading buffer before loading for Western blot. You may want to try that.

      You may also want to try saving your washes and running some on Western blot to see if you are losing your protein if interest in a wash step.

      In general, I believe your methods are valid. I have done many RNA-binding protein IPs, and I was always able to confirm the success of the IP by Western blot, often with as little as 1/20 of my sample, although the proteins were reasonably well expressed.

      I personally would not trust ChIP-Seq data without verification by Western blot, although I guess many do.
      Last edited by kerplunk412; 05-29-2014, 04:07 PM.

      Comment

      • muhe1985
        Junior Member
        • Jan 2014
        • 4

        #4
        Thank you very much for your detailed reply and instruction!

        According to your experience, what would the band from CHIP-Westernblot look like? a faint 'smear like' band or a solid strong band?

        Best,




        Originally posted by kerplunk412 View Post
        I spoke with someone who got her PhD in a lab that did a lot of ChIP, and their protocol was to heat the sample at 95 degrees for 30 minutes in loading buffer before loading for Western blot. You may want to try that.

        You may also want to try saving your washes and running some on Western blot to see if you are losing your protein if interest in a wash step.

        In general, I believe your methods are valid. I have done many RNA-binding protein IPs, and I was always able to confirm the success of the IP by Western blot, often with as little as 1/20 of my sample, although the proteins were reasonably well expressed.

        I personally would not trust ChIP-Seq data without verification by Western blot, although I guess many do.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
          by SEQadmin2



          CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

          Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
          ...
          07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
          by SEQadmin2


          Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

          The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
          ...
          07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
        0 responses
        17 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
        0 responses
        15 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
        0 responses
        13 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        24 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...