Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rmagno
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2016
    • 2

    #1

    Comparison of NGS technologies

    Hi All

    This is my first post!

    I am trying to get my head around the various RNA-sequencing platforms so I thought of doing a comprehensive comparison of existing technologies. Do you know whether this has been done recently (last year)?

    Could you help me collect the relevant variables for these comparisons? Some of these variables from the top of my head would be:

    - Depth
    - Read per run
    - Accuracy (single read not consensus)
    - Minimum starting material requirements
    - Read length
    - Amplification steps involved
    - Multiplexity
    - Fixed costs
    - Running costs (Cost per 1 million bases)
    - Sensitivity/Limit of detection


    Maybe we could make a nice matrix with all these variables/criteria as columns and different technologies as rows to have a nice comparison matrix.
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    This page should help with most of the questions.

    Also this page.

    Comment

    • rmagno
      Junior Member
      • Jul 2016
      • 2

      #3
      Thanks!, I am going to take a look at those webpages.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by SEQadmin2




        NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
        Yesterday, 06:46 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
      0 responses
      26 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
      0 responses
      17 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
      0 responses
      71 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
      0 responses
      48 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...