Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lechu
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2017
    • 4

    barcoded RNA adapter ligation for multiplexing

    Hi All,

    This is my first post here, so hello everyone!

    I'm wondering if it is possible to use RNA adapter ligated to (preferably) 3' end of the RNA for multiplexing the samples prior to RNA sequencing? If I understand correctly (an my knowledge may be narrow here), typically such adapters are added separately to individual samples, and then the barcodes are added later by PCR.

    I would like to:

    Ligate RNA adapters into multiple samples, and then pool them together before performing cDNA synthesis. After ligation, samples would be multiplexed, and processed as such from the very beginning. Specifically, I would like to perform a 3'UTR (or its polyA adjacent part) sequencing, using the custom adapter-specific primer containing barcode. My cDNA library would be made as follows, (with optional polyA enrichment):

    ........................................................................................... <-----------
    ....NNNNNNNNNNNNNN-AAAAAAAA [...] AAAAAA-BARCODE-ADAPTER

    I would then use a random primer and adapter-specific primer for generating a second cDNA strand, and add adapters for amplification on the flow cell by PCR.

    I can imagine such approach might lead to biases in case the RNA concentrations and/or quality in individual samples is highly variable. But assuming it is not, I see it as a sound approach. Or am I missing something?

    Thank is advance for any helpful insights.

    Cheers,
    Lech
    Last edited by Lechu; 02-13-2019, 09:09 AM. Reason: layout problems
  • cmbetts
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2012
    • 120

    #2
    Very doable, although random priming isn't necessary for second strand if you're using standard Gubler-Hoffman, the RNaseH handles the priming. This Nature Methods paper from the Broad should give some inspiration on how to do it https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4712044/

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    25 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    23 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    23 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    55 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...