Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • danielsbrewer
    Member
    • Feb 2009
    • 35

    #1

    Hunting for Human Infectious Agents in Cancer : PhD @ Norwich, UK

    Hunting for Human Infectious Agents in Cancer using data from Genomics England’s 100,000 genome project : PhD Studentship @ UEA, Norwich

    Infectious agents, such as bacteria and viruses, are involved in the development of a variety of human cancers such as cervical, liver, stomach and bladder cancer. We hypothesise that other infectious agents are directly linked to cancer development, but as yet remain unidentified. We have developed an analytic pipeline (SEPATH) that identifies infectious agents in whole genome sequencing data. This pipeline is already in place, working and currently being improved. Through a competitive process we have been awarded access to apply SEPATH to the whole genome sequence data of 40,000 cancer genomes from Genomics England’s 100,000 Genome project. Genomics England’s 100,000 Genome project is a large-scale initiative, backed by the UK government, to sequence samples from 100,000 patients including 40,000 from a range of different cancer types. The aim of this PhD studentship is to run SEPATH on this data and search for new infectious agents associated with cancer in a range of different types. The student will aim to answer the following questions:

    1. Are any pathogens significantly over-represented in a particular disease compared to normal tissue and other disease types.
    2. Are any pathogens increasingly common as the tumour grade increases or are they associated with other clinical categories.
    3. Does the diversity of the microbiome/virome vary across clinical categories.
    4. Are there recurrent sequences that do not align to known organisms for a particular cancer type. This will give the intriguing possibility of discovering brand new bacteria that are linked to cancer.

    These studies are anticipated to identify a "smoking-gun" that will spark further examinations for mechanisms of disease induction in the lab.

    References

    i) C. S. Cooper, R. Eeles, D. C. Wedge, P. Van Loo, G. Gundem, L. B. Alexandrov, B. Kremeyer, A. Butler, A. G. Lynch, N. Camacho, C. E. Massie, J. Kay, H. J. Luxton, S. Edwards, Z. Kote-Jarai, N. Dennis, S. Merson, D. Leongamornlert, J. Zamora, C. Corbishley, S. Thomas, S. Nik-Zainal, S. O’Meara, L. Matthews, J. Clark, R. Hurst, R. Mithen, R. G. Bristow, P. C. Boutros, M. Fraser, S. Cooke, K. Raine, D. Jones, A. Menzies, L. Stebbings, J. Hinton, J. Teague, S. McLaren, L. Mudie, C. Hardy, E. Anderson, O. Joseph, V. Goody, B. Robinson, M. Maddison, S. Gamble, C. Greenman, D. Berney, S. Hazell, N. Livni, C. Fisher, C. Ogden, P. Kumar, A. Thompson, C. Woodhouse, D. Nicol, E. Mayer, T. Dudderidge, N. C. Shah, V. Gnanapragasam, T. Voet, P. Campbell, A. Futreal, D. Easton, A. Y. Warren, C. S. Foster, M. R. Stratton, H. C. Whitaker, U. McDermott, D. S. Brewer, and D. E. Neal, “Analysis of the genetic phylogeny of multifocal prostate cancer identifies multiple independent clonal expansions in neoplastic and morphologically normal prostate tissue,” Nat. Genet., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 367–372, Mar. 2015.

    ii) G. Gundem, P. Van Loo, B. Kremeyer, L. B. Alexandrov, J. M. C. Tubio, E. Papaemmanuil, D. S. Brewer, H. M. L. Kallio, G. Högnäs, M. Annala, K. Kivinummi, V. Goody, C. Latimer, S. O’Meara, K. J. Dawson, W. Isaacs, M. R. Emmert-Buck, M. Nykter, C. Foster, Z. Kote-Jarai, D. Easton, H. C. Whitaker, D. E. Neal, C. S. Cooper, R. a. Eeles, T. Visakorpi, P. J. Campbell, U. McDermott, D. C. Wedge, and G. S. Bova, “The evolutionary history of lethal metastatic prostate cancer,” Nature, vol. 520, no. 7547, pp. 353–357, Apr. 2015.

    iii) D. T. Truong, E. A. Franzosa, T. L. Tickle, M. Scholz, G. Weingart, E. Pasolli, A. Tett, C. Huttenhower, and N. Segata, “MetaPhlAn2 for enhanced metagenomic taxonomic profiling,” Nat. Methods, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 902–903, Sep. 2015.

    iv) Wood, Derrick E., and Steven L. Salzberg. "Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments." Genome biology 15.3 (2014): R46.

    v) Chang, Alicia H., and Julie Parsonnet. "Role of bacteria in oncogenesis." Clinical microbiology reviews 23.4 (2010): 837-857.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2




    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
    Yesterday, 06:46 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
30 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
0 responses
21 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
71 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
48 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...