Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NathalieA
    Junior Member
    • May 2012
    • 7

    Does anyone have a solution

    I have to do 4 libraries preparation (Paired End 8kb library) on Francisella tularensis genome.

    Usually for these kind of library, I used the Hydroshear to DNA fragmentation at the good size. But unfortunatly, our Hydroshear is out of order, and I have no other one.

    I quickly read the forum but I didn't find any answer. The dsFragmentase will give me too small fragment.

    I have the intention to do the fragmentation by an enzyamatic digestion.
    My genome is a 1.89Mb, if I choose a 6base restriction enzyme, the probability of occurence is 1/4^6 (=1 on 4100 bases).
    If I choose a 8bp, I have a probability of 1/4^8 (=1/65536).

    do you have any advice to help me
  • ajthomas
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2010
    • 167

    #2
    I don't think a restriction enzyme is the way to go because you really need random fragmentation. If you use a 6-base cutter, for example, your average fragment size will be ~4000 bp, but there will be plenty of places in the genome where two sites for that enzyme might be several times that, and you will get no coverage in those locations.

    If you must use an enzyme, I would suggest using a general DNAse, but limit the time to get the right average fragment size. You will need to figure that out yourself. Use a constant amount of enzyme in a digest, and remove aliquots at time intervals to look at the size distribution. You might want to try a few different enzyme concentrations as well.

    A general DNAse will probably have some site preference, so the coverage won't be very even. The coverage might be more even if you used a 4-base cutter, or better yet, a mixture of several 4-base cutters (again titrating the digestion time). I don't know whether it would be better to mix the enzymes or use each one on separate aliquots of DNA and mix the DNA later.

    *I haven't used this approach for PE libraries, but you asked for suggestions and this is just one idea that might work.

    Comment

    • RCJK
      Senior Member
      • May 2009
      • 156

      #3
      I'd check out these if I were you:

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        Yesterday, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
        by SEQadmin2


        Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


        The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
        ...
        06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      11 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      18 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      52 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
      0 responses
      111 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...