I am currently using "gsRunProcessor 2.0.01.12".
For refiltering I follow the steps provided in the original manual @ page 56 and further.
Little summary of those pages:
gsRunProcessor --template=filterOnly > filterfile.xml (change the values in this xml file to your desired values)
And then to refilter:
runAnalysisFilter --pipe=filterfile.xml <your_D_folder_to_reanalyse>
Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
-
Originally posted by joa_ds View PostI still have to install the new versions of the software, so I cannot say what the cause of the 3-5% is.
But have you checked the standard filter values compared to the older software pipeline? I know we get +50% +100% more reads when tweaking the filter settings (especially in 'exotic' experiments such as bisulphite, chip-seq or pull-down (ChIP) experiments). And most of those additional reads do map and are valid.
Nevertheless, I am quite suspicious towards improved efficiency software-based for standard experiments, especially because I got a 'hint' from a Roche tech support guy to change the value of a filter from 0.05 to 0.10 as default value, which indeed improved reads passing the filters some %s.
When it appears to be a case of filter settings, i'd recommend you to just refilter your experiments. There is a chapter on it in the manual and it takes only 10 mins or so instead of going through the whole pipeline.
Leave a comment:
-
I still have to install the new versions of the software, so I cannot say what the cause of the 3-5% is.
But have you checked the standard filter values compared to the older software pipeline? I know we get +50% +100% more reads when tweaking the filter settings (especially in 'exotic' experiments such as bisulphite, chip-seq or pull-down (ChIP) experiments). And most of those additional reads do map and are valid.
Nevertheless, I am quite suspicious towards improved efficiency software-based for standard experiments, especially because I got a 'hint' from a Roche tech support guy to change the value of a filter from 0.05 to 0.10 as default value, which indeed improved reads passing the filters some %s.
When it appears to be a case of filter settings, i'd recommend you to just refilter your experiments. There is a chapter on it in the manual and it takes only 10 mins or so instead of going through the whole pipeline.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Tuxido View PostWe 've also already seen some really interesting variants being detected. Changes from "-" to "-" for example. Not really helpful
--
Phillip
Leave a comment:
-
We haven't validated yet. We still need to check these differences. We looked up a few in the alignment browser and these seemed to look ok. We 've also already seen some really interesting variants being detected. Changes from "-" to "-" for example. Not really helpful
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Tuxido View PostYeah we also tried a few older runs this week and decided to reanalyze everything because of the improvements. We only tried DNA for now.
I think there's also some improvements in the HCDiffs detection, because we seem to pick up more differences than can be explained by the additional sequence from the improved signalprocessing and mapping
I'm probably just being paranoid. More likely the alignment software was improved...
--
Phillip
Leave a comment:
-
Yeah we also tried a few older runs this week and decided to reanalyze everything because of the improvements. We only tried DNA for now.
I think there's also some improvements in the HCDiffs detection, because we seem to pick up more differences than can be explained by the additional sequence from the improved signalprocessing and mapping
Leave a comment:
-
3-5% more seq from new Roche software
We have reprocessed a few older runs using the new "Phase C" aka "v. 2.3" Roche Data Processing software that was released last week. This involves redoing image analysis/basecalling--so it is CPU-intensive. But we see more favorable results in 454BaseCallerMetrics.txt in every case we have tried. We have seen anywhere from 3% to just over 5% more totalBases.
Anyone else tried to reprocess older runs with the new software? If so, did you see improvements?
--
Phillip
PS The major improvement is that the GSAssembler (aka "Newbler") is now "cDNA-aware". EST assemblies work much better!Tags: None
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by seqadmin
The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist...-
Channel: Articles
04-22-2024, 07:01 AM -
-
by seqadmin
Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...-
Channel: Articles
04-04-2024, 04:25 PM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 11:49 AM
|
0 responses
13 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
Yesterday, 11:49 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-24-2024, 08:47 AM
|
0 responses
16 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-24-2024, 08:47 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
|
0 responses
61 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
|
0 responses
60 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
|
Leave a comment: