Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bcanton
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 2

    #1

    Nextera and multiplexing >12 samples?

    Hello SEQanswers,

    I'm considering a MiSeq for verification of newly assembled plasmids (<10kb per plasmid). Obviously, I'd like to be able to multiplex many plasmids per run.

    I know they sell a Nextera kit with 12 barcodes. Has anyone multiplexed ~96 samples together during Nextera sample prep? If so, how much of a pain was it?

    Thanks!

    Barry
  • krobison
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2007
    • 734

    #2
    I can't answer your question, but at $100/reaction, isn't this a pricey way to verify plasmids?

    Comment

    • bcanton
      Junior Member
      • Mar 2011
      • 2

      #3
      Maybe I'm missing something but here was my thinking -

      $1000/run ($750 for MiSeq run, a generous $250 for Nextera sample prep), ~100 plasmids multiplexed per run, so $10/plasmid with very deep coverage. For full plasmid sequence this compares pretty well with sanger at $3-4/read.

      Comment

      • epibio
        Registered Vendor
        • May 2010
        • 89

        #4
        Originally posted by bcanton View Post
        Has anyone multiplexed ~96 samples together during Nextera sample prep? If so, how much of a pain was it?
        We've heard from several customers who are multiplexing 96+ samples using Nextera library prep without any problems. For an example using 96 barcodes, see Adey et al. Genome Biology 2010, 11:R119. The methods section of the paper discusses the design of the barcodes and the sequences are provided in the supplementary tables.
        Last edited by epibio; 08-10-2011, 06:30 AM.
        Connect with Epicentre: Facebook | Twitter

        Comment

        • krobison
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2007
          • 734

          #5
          Originally posted by bcanton View Post
          Maybe I'm missing something but here was my thinking -

          $1000/run ($750 for MiSeq run, a generous $250 for Nextera sample prep), ~100 plasmids multiplexed per run, so $10/plasmid with very deep coverage. For full plasmid sequence this compares pretty well with sanger at $3-4/read.
          But isn't Nextera $100 per library reaction? Or do you think you use much smaller amounts of the Nextera reagents than their manual specifies and thereby split it across the multiple plasmids?

          Would certainly be cool if it works.

          Comment

          • ScottC
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2008
            • 244

            #6
            This could also be of interest, although I'm not sure of pricing...

            Comment

            • DZhang
              Senior Member
              • Jun 2010
              • 177

              #7
              Image you have 100 plasmids in a 10x10 grid, you pool them in two dimensions so you have 20 pools with 10 plasmids each. So you only need 20 libraries. The tricky part is downstream informatics.

              Comment

              • larissa
                Member
                • Mar 2010
                • 15

                #8
                Originally posted by DZhang View Post
                Image you have 100 plasmids in a 10x10 grid, you pool them in two dimensions so you have 20 pools with 10 plasmids each. So you only need 20 libraries. The tricky part is downstream informatics.
                Something like this?
                Citation: Neiman M, Lundin S, Savolainen P, Ahmadian A (2011) Decoding a Substantial Set of Samples in Parallel by Massive Sequencing. PLoS ONE 6(3): e17785. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017785

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                  by SEQadmin2



                  Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                  Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                  ...
                  10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                  by SEQadmin2


                  Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                  We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                  ...
                  09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
                0 responses
                36 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
                0 responses
                28 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
                0 responses
                41 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
                0 responses
                45 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...