Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • yaximik
    replied
    I wonder if it would be possible to reuse the flow cell, not to run completely new sequencing, but to repeat sequencing with clusters already there. Sequencing errors are generated at random, so repeated sequencing will not generate the same dataset. Or a flow cell with the good cluster density of a good library could be used to obtain longer reads. Removing just synthesized strand should not be a problem as it is done anyway in paired end runs. I am not sure about paired end chemistry though, could the cell after a paired end run sequenced in the reverse order? Certainly the current RFID system disallows this. Any thoughts?

    Leave a comment:


  • ECO
    replied
    Easiest way is just to break out the RFID chip (under the square "Illumina" pad on the top of the cartridge)...and when the scan fails, get a bypass code from icom.illumina.com. They are good for a week...I'm sure if you made a huge practice of this ILMN would crack down but it's easy enough for playing around.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nitrogen-DNE-sulfer
    replied
    Any had luck hacking the RFID system?
    I dont see any mention of it in the recipe XML files

    Leave a comment:


  • ECO
    replied
    Originally posted by gringer View Post
    About 372, perhaps? That's enough for 6 50bp runs with two barcode reads each (i.e. the newer dual-indexed Nextera barcodes).
    That would require hacking their RFID system...in the current form you can only use a cartridge once.

    Leave a comment:


  • gringer
    replied
    Originally posted by ECO View Post
    The answer seems pretty clearly that at about cycle 360-370 (haven't looked at images yet), things fall off a cliff. So 2x175 would be pushing it but probably possible.
    About 372, perhaps? That's enough for 6 50bp runs with two barcode reads each (i.e. the newer dual-indexed Nextera barcodes).

    Leave a comment:


  • ECO
    replied
    By the way, this run was from 12x libraries of 768 amplicons each (250bp long)...

    Leave a comment:


  • ECO
    replied
    Finally dug it out...enjoy:

    Leave a comment:


  • ECO
    replied
    Yes! I just have to remember to post it! Setting reminder now!

    Leave a comment:


  • ians
    replied
    Have you had a chance to get a fastqc profile?

    Leave a comment:


  • ECO
    replied
    Originally posted by krobison View Post
    Any reason to fear this could damage the instrument?
    No ill effects noticed yet.

    I wouldn't let it run dry and sit overnight...as (from reading the recipe xml files) it flushes the template position with incorporation buffer several times, likely to prevent template from drying on the sipper.

    Originally posted by Tanya12 View Post
    I also really would like to know about the Q-score at cycle150 or 200.
    I'll try to get the fastqc report up asap.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tanya12
    replied
    miseq Q-scores

    Originally posted by hedas2303 View Post
    Very cool!
    I wonder if you had any data on Q-scores during the run? From the Broad presentation (300bp) they ended at app 65% Q30, it would be interesting to see the drop off in your run too.
    I also really would like to know about the Q-score at cycle150 or 200.

    Thanks advance.
    Cheers!
    Tanya

    Leave a comment:


  • krobison
    replied
    Any reason to fear this could damage the instrument?

    Leave a comment:


  • hedas2303
    replied
    Any quality scores available?

    Very cool!
    I wonder if you had any data on Q-scores during the run? From the Broad presentation (300bp) they ended at app 65% Q30, it would be interesting to see the drop off in your run too.

    Leave a comment:


  • ECO
    started a topic Maximum number of cycles from 300-cycle MiSeq kit...

    Maximum number of cycles from 300-cycle MiSeq kit...

    Just finished this run this morning...it was an attempt at 151x251 to determine just how many cycles are contained in the 300-cycle reagent cartridge.



    After a successful 308 cycle run (2x151,1x6index), there is quite a bit of reagents left over, mainly the incorporation, scan, and cleave mixes which is all that's needed to sequence and and image.

    The answer seems pretty clearly that at about cycle 360-370 (haven't looked at images yet), things fall off a cliff. So 2x175 would be pushing it but probably possible.

    Next time we have a run that fails early, I'm going to overfill a new reagent cartridge to see what's possible...2x200 seems really easy. 2x250 probably stretching it but we'll see!

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    The Impact of AI in Genomic Medicine
    by seqadmin



    Artificial intelligence (AI) has evolved from a futuristic vision to a mainstream technology, highlighted by the introduction of tools like OpenAI's ChatGPT and Google's Gemini. In recent years, AI has become increasingly integrated into the field of genomics. This integration has enabled new scientific discoveries while simultaneously raising important ethical questions1. Interviews with two researchers at the center of this intersection provide insightful perspectives into...
    02-26-2024, 02:07 PM
  • seqadmin
    Multiomics Techniques Advancing Disease Research
    by seqadmin


    New and advanced multiomics tools and technologies have opened new avenues of research and markedly enhanced various disciplines such as disease research and precision medicine1. The practice of merging diverse data from various ‘omes increasingly provides a more holistic understanding of biological systems. As Maddison Masaeli, Co-Founder and CEO at Deepcell, aptly noted, “You can't explain biology in its complex form with one modality.”

    A major leap in the field has
    ...
    02-08-2024, 06:33 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 06:12 AM
0 responses
19 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 02-23-2024, 04:11 PM
0 responses
67 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 02-21-2024, 08:52 AM
0 responses
75 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 02-20-2024, 08:57 AM
0 responses
66 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X