Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ECO
    replied
    Originally posted by pmiguel View Post
    Actually my FAS wants to contact your FAS/FSE to find out if there is someway to lock that alignment down. But maybe it just happens sometimes during instrument "burn in"...
    Marc Rosoff is our guy.

    Seems to be starting to happen on the second of our newest instruments as well...I'm hoping something is just loose from initial assembly and not something that will continually go out of spec.

    Saddest part is that even when our runs start to drop to <70% cluster PF because of this problem, the instrument still produces enough in-spec data that ILMN won't replace the reagents.

    Leave a comment:


  • pmiguel
    replied
    Originally posted by ECO View Post
    I would guess that your stage tilt is out of spec or very close. Pretty quick fix for an FSE and tech support will replace the reagents. We had this problem on a couple of ours but after a secondary checkup they've been fine.

    Whenever we see "swirly" images like this, that was the cause.
    Wow, you are good. FAS ran a check and stage tilt failed! It had passed during the install, but somehow got out of alignment. Should be fixed now.

    We did a 2x25 nt run a couple of days back with the stage tilt presumably out of alignment -- worked fine. Could see no trace of this issue. Probably not that far off spec. Spec is -400 to 400 and the tilt was in the 700s when checked yesterday before it was re-aligned.

    Actually my FAS wants to contact your FAS/FSE to find out if there is someway to lock that alignment down. But maybe it just happens sometimes during instrument "burn in"...

    --
    Phillip

    Leave a comment:


  • ECO
    replied
    I know...same with ours...the cluster density and other metrics may still pass their specs even with some of the image out of focus. The FAS/FSE had to come back and readjust the stage post install.

    Leave a comment:


  • pmiguel
    replied
    Originally posted by ECO View Post
    I would guess that your stage tilt is out of spec or very close. Pretty quick fix for an FSE and tech support will replace the reagents. We had this problem on a couple of ours but after a secondary checkup they've been fine.

    Whenever we see "swirly" images like this, that was the cause.
    Thanks. Actually the FAS did the install. I'll mention this to her. (It was just the phiX validation run, so we are not out any reagents.)

    Phillip

    Leave a comment:


  • ECO
    replied
    I would guess that your stage tilt is out of spec or very close. Pretty quick fix for an FSE and tech support will replace the reagents. We had this problem on a couple of ours but after a secondary checkup they've been fine.

    Whenever we see "swirly" images like this, that was the cause.

    Leave a comment:


  • pmiguel
    started a topic MiSeq intermittent blurry images.

    MiSeq intermittent blurry images.

    Here is a quality plot of our ongoing MiSeq validation run:



    Overall pretty good. But, if you look at one of the more poorly performing tiles you see:



    Seems largely to be a tile-specific issue:



    Any ideas what is causing this? Vibration seems unlikely because I would expect intermittent vibrations to effect the tiles randomly.

    --
    Phillip

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2




    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
    Today, 06:46 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
22 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
0 responses
14 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
67 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
47 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...