Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • susjoh
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 1

    #1

    Differences in read count from barcoded RADseq?

    Hello,

    I have recently inherited some RAD data sequenced on an Illumina GAII platform. The protocol used was similar to Baird et al. (2008; see end of post for link). The samples were barcoded and sequenced in lanes containing libraries from two samples (each prepared sample should have had the same DNA concentration).

    My question is related to the sequencing output. I have found a lot of variation between the read number for each individual sample; there can be up to a threefold difference in the number of reads between individuals.

    Could anyone on this forum explain to me the reasons that there would be such large differences in read count from each sample?

    Thank you!


    Baird et al: http://www.plosone.org/article/info:...l.pone.0003376
  • jboone123
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2010
    • 4

    #2
    Do you know exactly how much variation you are seeing? Often times with next gen seq'ing projects variation between samples is quite common. If it is a tremendous difference I might be a little concerned but if it's not too much it shouldn't effect things too much.

    If you are just curious about the reasons, here are a few:
    1) different starting gDNA concentrations
    2) different starting gDNA qualities
    3) different starting primer/barcode concentrations
    4) different starting primer/barcode qualities
    5) PCR bias
    6) Enzymatic digestion variance
    7) sequencing variability (even multiplexed nextera samples are variable)
    8) variable base calling (not likely)

    Hope that helps!

    Jason
    www.floragenex.com
    www.biotasciences.com

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
      by SEQadmin2



      Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

      Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
      ...
      10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
      by SEQadmin2


      Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

      We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
      ...
      09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
    0 responses
    31 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
    0 responses
    22 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
    0 responses
    39 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
    0 responses
    45 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...