Good to know! Thanks for the reply!
Ines
Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by inesdesantiago View PostSorry for this basic question. But what is the tile? Is it the pictures of the lane? So, each little photographed square in a given lane is called a tile (tile 1, tile 2 ,etc etc)?
ines
Leave a comment:
-
-
Sorry for this basic question. But what is the tile? Is it the pictures of the lane? So, each little photographed square in a given lane is called a tile (tile 1, tile 2 ,etc etc)?
ines
Leave a comment:
-
-
Further to the OP's original question:
The _seq.txt file is just as cgb says: lane, tile, X, Y, sequence. X & Y are in pixels relative to the upper left corner of each tile image, with +X to the right, and +Y down (don't ask).
The _sig2.txt also file starts with lane, tile, X, Y. The rest is intensities for each base, each cycle. Intensities have been corrected for crosstalk and phasing. Pay attention here: For each cycle, there are four values (a,c,g,t). They are separated by *blanks*. Cycles (4 values) are in turn separates by *tabs*.
The _prb.txt file contains base probabilities arranged the same way. No lane/tile/x/y here, though. The probabilities are given Solexa-style: Q = 10 * log (P/(1-P)), where P is the probability that the base is a/c/g/t. Not to be confused with phread-style scores, encoded as Q = -10 * log (E), where E is the probability of an *incorrect* call.
Having said all that, I'm moved to enquire: Why are you looking at what are really intermediate data files? The end product of the pipeline for most purposes is the _sequence.txt files produced by the Gerald step. There you will find what amounts to fastq-format files, containing sequence and base scores, plus lane/tile/X/Y. Only beware that the scores are Solexa-style and encoded as ascii by adding 64 (so Q40='h'). maq expects a true fastq file, with phred-style scores plus 33 (Q40='I').
Leave a comment:
-
-
To amplify a bit on cgb's posting: If you align your reads to a known, error-free reference (e.g., PhiX), you can then count the true errors and establish a true error rate. Compare this to the estimated error rate embodied in the Q scores. They should match: Out of all the Q30 bases in all the reads, there should be 1 error in 1000, and so on for each Q value.
An easy place to find this information is in the s_<lane>_qreport.txt file produced by Gerald when you do an alignment on the lane (ANALYSIS default or Eland). What you'll see there is that what's called Q40 really has 0.5% errors = Q23.
Leave a comment:
-
-
the scores are supposed to reflect the chances of a basecall being in error, 20 = 1 in 100 etc. If they do this accurately they are "calibrated". Raw Bustard scores are not well calibrated - it tends to over score and underscore bases and shove a lot into a Q40 bin (wrongly). he scores can be adjusted after the fact using several well known methods - the newer (0.4) / 1.0 release of the GAPipeline allows for some degree of recalibration using control lane data.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by bioinfosm View Postcgb,
There is this _sequence.txt output per lane as well, that is the reads in seq file minus the QC reads that fail chastity filter. This can then be converted to fastq using one of the MAQ utilities.
I made a <50 line perl thingie to take the .prb and .seq files to make a fastq. If I can do it, it can't be that hard
Leave a comment:
-
-
-
Originally posted by cgb View Postthe sig2 files are processed "traces" you can draw a bar chart with them for each sequence. The seq files are the final data - its trivial to convert the seq and prb files into a fastq file - there are tools floating around to do this.
generally the key is the first 4 columns : lane, tiles, x, y for the given cluster that gave the sequence.
can you say more on these programs that convert prb + seq into fastq format?
There is this _sequence.txt output per lane as well, that is the reads in seq file minus the QC reads that fail chastity filter. This can then be converted to fastq using one of the MAQ utilities.
Any advantage of using seq + prb, instead of the filtered _sequence? I have heard from MAQ, SSAHA and other authors that using the filtered file is preferred to get better alignment results using their tools
sm
Leave a comment:
-
-
... on the sig2 files - your row (= cluster) has the same key for the first 4 cols. then you have 4 values for A,C,G,T <Tab> A,C,T,G etc.... up to cycle number
note - your quality values are raw Qscores emitted by Bustard and will not be wel calibrated.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Not quite....
the flowcell has 8 lanes. lane number is the lane. each lane has up to 330 'tiles' they are numbered in a snakey pattern, the X,Y is the cluster co-ordinate on the given tile
Leave a comment:
-
-
Lane = 1-8 (which channel of the flowcell)
X,Y = physical location of the cluster on the flowcell...
Leave a comment:
-
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by seqadmin
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for proactive pathogen surveillance systems. As ongoing threats like avian influenza and newly emerging infections continue to pose risks, researchers are working to improve how quickly and accurately pathogens can be identified and tracked. In a recent SEQanswers webinar, two experts discussed how next-generation sequencing (NGS) and machine learning are shaping efforts to monitor viral variation and trace the origins of infectious...-
Channel: Articles
03-24-2025, 11:48 AM -
-
by seqadmin
This yearβs Advances in Genome Biology and Technology (AGBT) General Meeting commemorated the 25th anniversary of the event at its original venue on Marco Island, Florida. While this yearβs event didnβt include high-profile musical performances, the industry announcements and cutting-edge research still drew the attention of leading scientists.
The Headliner
The biggest announcement was Roche stepping back into the sequencing platform market. In the years since...-
Channel: Articles
03-03-2025, 01:39 PM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 10:17 AM
|
0 responses
7 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
Yesterday, 10:17 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 03-20-2025, 05:03 AM
|
0 responses
49 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
03-20-2025, 05:03 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 03-19-2025, 07:27 AM
|
0 responses
59 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
03-19-2025, 07:27 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 03-18-2025, 12:50 PM
|
0 responses
50 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
03-18-2025, 12:50 PM
|
Leave a comment: