Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • roliwilhelm
    Member
    • Jun 2012
    • 38

    #1

    Range of DNA (ng) Necessary for Illumina Sequencing

    Hello,

    I'm attempting SIP-metagenomics and the limiting factor is the quantity of DNA I will recover for sequencing. So far I'm able to recover ~30ng of enriched DNA (which is not bad!), but estimates for paired-end, Illumina Hi-Seq say minimum 500ng. Now, I'm caught balancing between whether to do whole genome amplification or pool multiple SIP-DNA runs to get as close to 500ng as possible. The latter is costly in time and reagent, but would likely produce a less biased sequence library. I am wondering whether anyone has advice on that, AND, more importantly, what the lower limits for quantity of DNA are for Illumina library prep?

    Thanks in advance,

    Roli
  • HESmith
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 512

    #2
    ChIP-Seq libraries are constructed from 1-10ng input DNA. You could adapt the protocol for your application.

    Comment

    • roliwilhelm
      Member
      • Jun 2012
      • 38

      #3
      Thanks for the input. I looked up ChIP-Seq and found that it employs special sequencing methodology (cluster sequencing) which seems like an extra amplification step of bound DNA. The whole ChIP part of the process isn't useful in my case b/c I'm looking at total DNA (not specific components bound or bindable to protein). Still, you're comment is helpful b/c it suggests there is alternative technology to MDA.

      Comment

      • HESmith
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2009
        • 512

        #4
        All Illumina sequencing uses cluster generation, so your objection is unclear. Perhaps it would be useful for you to review the technology. And you misunderstood my reference to ChIP-Seq; the salient point is that it's feasible to construct libraries from small amounts of input DNA without amplification.

        Comment

        • roliwilhelm
          Member
          • Jun 2012
          • 38

          #5
          Yep! Thanks for the info! I did get your point and, as anyone new to sequencing technology knows, it can be difficult to get to heart of the subject b/c every answer is tempered towards a specific application and every webpage (at least @ Illumina) is selling a different kit and their selling points don't generalize easily.

          Comment

          • snorberg
            Junior Member
            • Jan 2013
            • 5

            #6
            Hey,

            If you are using the TruSeq library prep kit, than yes, 500ng of DNA is the recommended input. However, if you use Illumina's Nextera or Nextera XT library prep kits, the required input is 50ng and 1ng respectively. The protocols are also much quicker and easier.

            Nextera Product Info: http://www.illumina.com/products/nex..._prep_kit.ilmn

            Hope that helps.

            Best, Steve

            Comment

            • roliwilhelm
              Member
              • Jun 2012
              • 38

              #7
              Great! Thanks Steve!

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                by SEQadmin2




                NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
                Today, 06:46 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                by SEQadmin2



                Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                ...
                10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
              0 responses
              22 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
              0 responses
              14 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
              0 responses
              67 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
              0 responses
              47 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...