Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hduborjal
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2014
    • 5

    #1

    test of Xgen blocking oligo

    Did someone try the XGen blocking oligo from IDT instead of classical blocking oligos ? Is there a improvement of the off target ?
  • hduborjal
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2014
    • 5

    #2
    Hi, thank you for your answer.
    I understand that you use dual indexing.
    My first question is : Did you try specific Xgen blocker or the universal one for Illumina HT libraries ?
    My second one : what was the on-target before using the Xgen blocker ? Is there an improvement by using it ?

    Comment

    • magarine
      Junior Member
      • Sep 2010
      • 5

      #3
      Thanks superduper,

      I'm doing to setup pre indexing hybridization method and test xGen IDT oligo blocks.
      I'm happy to meet you here.

      I am a little of bit surprised that on-target rate of perfect complementary blocking oligo was lower than xGen.

      Conceptually some idea maybe was in synthesis of oligo for blocking.

      Comment

      • Ingeneious
        Member
        • Dec 2014
        • 30

        #4
        Originally posted by superduper
        I was using one barcode per library.
        1. I used the universal 8nt blocking oligo (mix of TS-p5 and TS-p7(8nt))

        2. my on-targets were:
        single capture; barcoding happens after hyb step (basically XT protocol): 70%
        XGen blocking: 58-73%
        Inosines instead of barcode location: up to 33%
        perfect complement: 45%
        random nucleotides: up to 35%

        This is for PE37 sequencing. To compare samples where I had run reads longer, I clipped them back to PE37 to have a fair comparison between different conditions.
        Your % on-target will increase the longer your read lengths are; I saw PE101 of 82% translate to 69% when I clipped it to PE37.
        Did you add any kind of termination to the blocking oligo?

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by SEQadmin2




          NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
          Today, 06:46 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
        0 responses
        22 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
        0 responses
        14 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        67 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        47 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...