Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sanjaysingh765
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 5

    #1

    Denovo assembled genome quality

    I recently assembled a genome using my PE 100 reads and got these datas
    N75 336
    N50 451
    N25 650
    Minimum 101
    Maximum 6,123
    Average 428
    Count 171,034
    Total 73,189,397





    Can anyone tell me that whether they are OK or not?
  • westerman
    Rick Westerman
    • Jun 2008
    • 1104

    #2
    You could not get your genome published in that form (it is too broken up) so in that aspect the answer is "no". On the other hand you might be able to get some useful information from what you have assembled. You could also deposit the reads and the assembly into SRA or another archive.

    Comment

    • sanjaysingh765
      Junior Member
      • Jun 2011
      • 5

      #3
      Originally posted by westerman View Post
      You could not get your genome published in that form (it is too broken up) so in that aspect the answer is "no". On the other hand you might be able to get some useful information from what you have assembled. You could also deposit the reads and the assembly into SRA or another archive.
      Thanks for reply. Actually I want to use this assembled genome for differential expression analysis. Is it OK for that?

      Comment

      • Brian Bushnell
        Super Moderator
        • Jan 2014
        • 2709

        #4
        It's not ideal for that because the fragments are generally shorter than what you would expect for full-length genes. Before using that assembly, I would do whatever possible to improve it, either by better using the existing data (different preprocessing, different assembler, etc) or generating more data.

        Comment

        • westerman
          Rick Westerman
          • Jun 2008
          • 1104

          #5
          Usually a person will do rna-seq for differential expression analysis (DEA) and not bother with a whole genome assembly. Of course there are other ways to do DEA. I am not sure what your assembly will get you.

          BTW, just as double check, in your first post you were talking about a whole genome project, correct? I ask because will your numbers are poor for a whole genome project they are not bad for a rna-Seq project ... if that is indeed what your biological sample was.
          Last edited by westerman; 09-03-2014, 10:26 AM. Reason: Added some explanation.

          Comment

          • sanjaysingh765
            Junior Member
            • Jun 2011
            • 5

            #6
            Originally posted by westerman View Post
            Usually a person will do rna-seq for differential expression analysis (DEA) and not bother with a whole genome assembly. Of course there are other ways to do DEA. I am not sure what your assembly will get you.

            BTW, just as double check, in your first post you were talking about a whole genome project, correct? I ask because will your numbers are poor for a whole genome project they are not bad for a rna-Seq project ... if that is indeed what your biological sample was.
            Actually I assembled this using RNAseq data using CLC genomics workbench. I am a newbie in this field. Am I doing something wrong?

            Comment

            • westerman
              Rick Westerman
              • Jun 2008
              • 1104

              #7
              Ah. rna-seq data. That explains it. I do not use CLC myself and unsure if they have a tools for creating denovo transcripts. In my experience there is a big difference in how assembly of a genome and assembly of a transcriptome are approached however in a quick reading of the CLC literature it does not seem like they make such a differentiation.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                by SEQadmin2



                NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection of antimicrobial...
                Today, 06:46 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                by SEQadmin2



                Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                ...
                10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
              0 responses
              22 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
              0 responses
              14 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
              0 responses
              67 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
              0 responses
              47 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...