Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ildem
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2015
    • 5

    #1

    Best Library kit for illumina low amount RNA

    Hi all,
    we are interested in doing RNA-seq (for differential gene expression analysis) on total RNA samples. Our sequencer is illumina HiSeq 2500.
    We have approximately 20-50ng of RNA per sample.
    I have found the following kits for library preparation:

    1. Takara/Clontech
    SMARTer Stranded RNA-Seq Kits—Strand-Specific Library Construction for Transcriptome Analysis on Illumina Platforms
    needs 100 pico to 100 ng

    2. TruSeq kits seem to need a min 100 ng.(right?)

    3. NEBNext Ultra RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina
    Total RNA:
    10 ng – 1 μg

    4. Epicentre
    ScriptSeq™ v2 RNA-Seq Library Preparation Kit
    0.5ng-50 ng

    5. Nugene Ovation® RNA-Seq System V2
    min 0.5ng RNA


    We heard NEBNext is good, and we have used Nugene(worked ok)

    In your experience, which is the best for gene expression analysis?

    Many thanks!
    3
    Takara/Clontech SMARTer Stranded RNA-Seq Kits
    33.33%
    1
    TruSeq
    33.33%
    1
    NEBNext Ultra RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina
    33.33%
    1
    Epicentre ScriptSeq™ v2 RNA-Seq Library Preparation Kit
    0.00%
    0
    Nugene Ovation® RNA-Seq System V2
    0.00%
    0

    The poll is expired.

  • RNA
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2010
    • 3

    #2
    Need a little more information to make a clear recommendation

    Hi ildem,

    Before we help you decide which kit is best, it would be nice to know more about the quality of the RNA you will be using in this study. Is it high quality RNA from fresh samples? Or is it degraded, or even from FFPE samples?

    Also when you say you want to do "RNA-Seq on total RNA" samples do you mean Total RNA-Seq (using RiboZero) or just that you want to start with Total RNA and do a polyA capture based mRNA prep?

    Are you interested in mostly coding mRNA or do you also want to look at non-coding RNAs, many of which may not have a polyA tail?

    Regardless of these answers 20 to 50 ng of total RNA is not really that low these days. Many researchers successfully use the TruSeq kits from Illumina at these levels, even though they are spec'd out for 100 ng.

    If you have good RNA (RIN of >8), and want to study differential gene expression levels, then I would try the TruSeq Stranded mRNA Sample Prep Kit from Illumina.

    Good Luck!

    Sincerely,

    RNA

    Comment

    • ildem
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2015
      • 5

      #3
      Dear RNA,
      Thank you very much!

      We have good RINs (9-10) just not much of the RNA and its quite precious.
      Would you then use the true-seq kits?

      If we were to have lower amounts, say5-10 ng, with good RINs, which would you then recommend?

      many thanks!
      i

      Comment

      • ildem
        Junior Member
        • Jan 2015
        • 5

        #4
        Dear RNA,
        Thank you very much!

        We have good RINs (9-10) just not much of the RNA and its quite precious.
        Would you then use the true-seq kits?

        If we were to have lower amounts, say5-10 ng, with good RINs, which would you then recommend?

        many thanks!
        i

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by SEQadmin2




          NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
          10-30-2026, 06:46 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
        0 responses
        37 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        72 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        48 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...